Q: What are the specific issues users of ATI Video Converter may encounter?
A: Users running 32-bit software on 64-bit systems are encountering issues getting quality output from the encoder and 32-bit users have also experienced some anomalies in the playback. It was not released for support on 64-bit operating systems. Our engineering teams have been alerted of the 32-bit issues and are currently working to address them. We have a defined roadmap for the application and plan to add new baseline functionality, ease-of-use and stability in coming versions.
Q: Why are reviewers seeing so little GPU processing during transcoding?
A: The ATI Video Converter uses the GPU for only a portion of the video encoding. Specifically, the GPU currently offloads only the motion estimation portion of the encoding pipeline which is the most compute intensive part of the encoder. The GPU is particularly well-suited for this task. Given that a fixed workload is being offloaded to the GPU the load on the GPU may be relatively low or high based on the specific model of GPU.
Q: When will the stability and quality of the ATI Video Converter improve in a new release?
A: We have a defined roadmap for the application and plan to add new baseline functionality, ease-of-use and stability in coming versions. We are evaluating now when we can most quickly offer those improvements, and will update you as soon as we have more information.
Q: Why did AMD release such a buggy software application into the market?
A: The ATI Video Converter is a basic utility that introduces users of Catalyst to the capabilities of Stream processing on 32-bit operating systems. While it isn’t perfect, The level of functionality and quality is appropriate for maximizing the conversion speed on the most widely used video formats. Improvements are already being made and users can expect to have a much higher quality experience with future revisions.
Q: Why does ATI Video Converter not work on 64-bit operating systems when so many PCs are moving in that direction?
A: While the move to 64-bit is well underway, 32-bit OS’s satisfy the mainstream consumer and the ATI Video Converter was to fill that segment first. We are evaluating our roadmap for future improvements, including the possibility of offering a 64-bit solution.
原帖由 wopeipeipei 于 2008-12-22 12:39 发表
AMD一点诚意都没有,吹了那么半天牛,搞出那么烂的一个东西,太让人失望!另外,ATI的CCC太山寨,跟NV驱动的控制面板比起来实在惨不忍睹!
原帖由 kvip 于 2008-12-23 11:26 发表
感觉党重出江湖.
还记得BD出来的时候...GPU使用率80%左右..CPU使用率40%左右..CUDA被众AFAN说得一文不值...
没想到轮到更作孽的STEAM软件出来...CPU竟然是100%...GPU竟然是20%左右.....都不好意思说了.
原帖由 stcshy_1 于 2008-12-23 11:30 发表
那是因为BD当时速度只有4核肉的1/3,兼且崩溃不断
CUDA减速{lol:] 还想不被骂?
AVIVO converter速度是目前BD的2~3倍,怎么不好意思说?
GPU占用根本不是问题,关键是速度
你这种忽悠党还是早点洗洗睡吧,大家 ...
原帖由 kvip 于 2008-12-23 11:38 发表
BD用滤镜是不错的选择.....
真烦用威力导演吧....哈哈...而且BD1.1版支持格式也开始多了....
你又误导人了,原来转码不需要画质了.{titter:] 只要速度够快,就满足了....那要STEAM干什么.
自煸自己一EG..
原帖由 kvip 于 2008-12-23 11:26 发表
感觉党重出江湖.
还记得BD出来的时候...GPU使用率80%左右..CPU使用率40%左右..CUDA被众AFAN说得一文不值...
没想到轮到更作孽的STEAM软件出来...CPU竟然是100%...GPU竟然是20%左右.....都不好意思说了.
原帖由 HuaErZ 于 2008-12-23 12:17 发表
这新闻驱家有翻译的。
avivo转码GPU占用低,是因为只在转码的部分环节起作用,大部分还是靠CPU。
视频转码如果是用来商用或发布之类,质量远比速度要重要的多。
原帖由 stcshy_1 于 2008-12-23 13:20 发表
你管GPU占用多少,只要看实际效果就行了
就算只有20%的GPU占用也比你80%的占用速度快2,3倍{lol:]
一个AVIVO converter已经可以顶NV所有CUDA视频转换工具了{closedeyes:]
原帖由 stcshy_1 于 2008-12-23 13:20 发表
你管GPU占用多少,只要看实际效果就行了
就算只有20%的GPU占用也比你80%的占用速度快2,3倍{lol:]
一个AVIVO converter已经可以顶NV所有CUDA视频转换工具了{closedeyes:]
原帖由 DonaldGoD 于 2008-12-23 17:08 发表
你指的实际效果恐怕单单是转换速度吧,你果然是选择性忽略转换后的错误画质了。我貌似记得你们AFANS以前不是老说N卡只会傻快画质跟A卡差得远了。到这个视频转码就转调子了?
原帖由 stcshy_1 于 2008-12-23 18:30 发表
AVIVO converter是每月强制更新的
所以基本上不用担心除BUG更新的问题
stream商业软件目前基本没有
不过这个对普通用户来说不是什么问题就是了
原帖由 stcshy_1 于 2008-12-23 18:30 发表
AVIVO converter是每月强制更新的
所以基本上不用担心除BUG更新的问题
stream商业软件目前基本没有
不过这个对普通用户来说不是什么问题就是了
原帖由 stcshy_1 于 2008-12-23 18:30 发表
AVIVO converter是每月强制更新的
所以基本上不用担心除BUG更新的问题
stream商业软件目前基本没有
不过这个对普通用户来说不是什么问题就是了
欢迎光临 POPPUR爱换 (https://we.poppur.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.4 |