POPPUR爱换

标题: 真心没想到I5单核性能会这么强 [打印本页]

作者: divx001 时间: 2012-6-17 12:46
标题: 真心没想到I5单核性能会这么强
前天入了I5 2380P用chrome19跑下日蜘蛛居然只有168ms，超到3.6G的E84用chrome19大约240ms。

intel真心牛逼

作者: dennyq 时间: 2012-6-17 13:10
恩，超强悍的单线程能力。I5性价比还是很不错的。

作者: gtx5 时间: 2012-6-17 13:15
日蜘蛛是什么

求测试

作者: divx001 时间: 2012-6-17 13:17

gtx5 发表于 2012-6-17 13:15
日蜘蛛是什么

求测试

http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html

选0.9.1

作者: AlcatrazX 时间: 2012-6-17 13:23
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: dennyq 时间: 2012-6-17 13:26

AlcatrazX 发表于 2012-6-17 13:23
chrome 19.0.1084.56, 3.6G e7200，
============================================
RESULTS (means an ...

IE9 跑146MS

作者: 真明镜止水 时间: 2012-6-17 13:28
193.3,4G的E52.lz的e84见了鬼了。

作者: xiekaia 时间: 2012-6-17 13:36
Total: 136.4ms +/- 1.0%
E3-1230v2 win7 x64 IE9

作者: wawa1234 时间: 2012-6-17 14:33
I5 2300,win7 64
IE9,178
FOX,200

作者: seasmiles 时间: 2012-6-17 14:35
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: Gone 时间: 2012-6-17 14:38
本帖最后由 Gone 于 2012-6-18 21:17 编辑

不至于吧，E84只超3.6G就满足了？

下面是 E3110 @ 4.2G 的成绩，2500K也有，机器没开，回头上对比。
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                146.1ms +/- 1.4%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                22.4ms +/- 3.1%
cube:             6.9ms +/- 9.1%
morph:             6.6ms +/- 5.6%
raytrace:          8.9ms +/- 5.9%

  access:             13.8ms +/- 3.3%
binary-trees:       1.1ms +/- 20.5%
fannkuch:          6.7ms +/- 5.2%
nbody:             4.0ms +/- 0.0%
nsieve:             2.0ms +/- 0.0%

  bitops:             9.8ms +/- 8.3%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 0.7ms +/- 49.3%
bits-in-byte:       3.1ms +/- 7.3%
bitwise-and:       2.2ms +/- 13.7%
nsieve-bits:       3.8ms +/- 7.9%

  controlflow:          1.8ms +/- 16.7%
recursive:          1.8ms +/- 16.7%

  crypto:             11.8ms +/- 3.8%
aes:                4.4ms +/- 8.4%
md5:                3.5ms +/- 10.8%
sha1:             3.9ms +/- 5.8%

  date:                13.1ms +/- 6.0%
format-tofte:       7.4ms +/- 8.1%
format-xparb:       5.7ms +/- 6.1%

  math:                11.2ms +/- 4.0%
cordic:             1.9ms +/- 11.9%
partial-sums:       7.2ms +/- 4.2%
spectral-norm:    2.1ms +/- 10.8%

  regexp:             6.5ms +/- 5.8%
dna:                6.5ms +/- 5.8%

  string:             55.7ms +/- 1.7%
base64:             3.6ms +/- 10.3%
fasta:             6.3ms +/- 5.5%
tagcloud:          16.3ms +/- 3.0%
unpack-code:       21.5ms +/- 1.8%
validate-input:    8.0ms +/- 4.2%
客厅的2500K也跑了一下，给跪了，一样的 Win7X64  Chorme19

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 187.5ms +/- 1.2%
--------------------------------------------

作者: fzmailyl 时间: 2012-6-17 14:48

作者: shamozhizhou 时间: 2012-6-17 14:49
Au可惨了，RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 323.2ms +/- 6.5%

作者: Ephyer 时间: 2012-6-17 15:51
有3d方面的成绩，和gpu有没有关系？

不同浏览器和系统估计差别也不小的

作者: 112777013 时间: 2012-6-17 16:03
Total: 401.2ms +/- 2.1%

X200 P8600

作者: 112777013 时间: 2012-6-17 16:12
Total: 295.4ms +/- 1.3%

5000开核 OC 3G

作者: kklz 时间: 2012-6-18 04:02
本帖最后由 kklz 于 2012-6-18 04:03 编辑

我就是楼主说的超到3.6G的E84
chrome19

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                180.0ms +/- 1.2%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                26.9ms +/- 2.0%
cube:             8.4ms +/- 7.2%
morph:             7.6ms +/- 4.9%
raytrace:          10.9ms +/- 3.7%

  access:             16.6ms +/- 6.8%
binary-trees:       1.4ms +/- 26.4%
fannkuch:          7.8ms +/- 8.4%
nbody:             4.9ms +/- 12.8%
nsieve:             2.5ms +/- 24.3%

  bitops:             11.8ms +/- 6.9%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 0.9ms +/- 25.1%
bits-in-byte:       3.8ms +/- 11.9%
bitwise-and:       2.7ms +/- 17.9%
nsieve-bits:       4.4ms +/- 11.4%

  controlflow:          2.0ms +/- 0.0%
recursive:          2.0ms +/- 0.0%

  crypto:             15.2ms +/- 4.9%
aes:                5.8ms +/- 7.8%
md5:                4.3ms +/- 8.0%
sha1:             5.1ms +/- 10.3%

  date:                16.2ms +/- 4.1%
format-tofte:       9.1ms +/- 4.5%
format-xparb:       7.1ms +/- 10.0%

  math:                14.0ms +/- 4.8%
cordic:             2.4ms +/- 15.4%
partial-sums:       8.8ms +/- 5.1%
spectral-norm:    2.8ms +/- 23.5%

  regexp:             7.9ms +/- 5.1%
dna:                7.9ms +/- 5.1%

  string:             69.4ms +/- 2.6%
base64:             4.7ms +/- 19.0%
fasta:             8.2ms +/- 5.5%
tagcloud:          19.8ms +/- 4.1%
unpack-code:       26.5ms +/- 2.9%
validate-input:    10.2ms +/- 4.4%

作者: divx001 时间: 2012-6-18 06:39
我靠，你们咋跑的都这么猛

作者: cngzhr 时间: 2012-6-18 09:11
AMD 1055，虚拟机里chrome19

RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 481.9ms +/- 15.7%

作者: BitDefender 时间: 2012-6-18 10:01
二奶机G530 8G FX13.0.1

RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 266.1ms +/- 3.1%
--------------------------------------------

作者: 猪尾巴 时间: 2012-6-18 12:11
I5四核心6MB三级缓存，I7四核心八线程8MB三级缓存，所以追求单核心性能的上I5好了，否则买个I7禁用超线程更好

作者: q8508488 时间: 2012-6-18 13:08
，，我测试有问题吗？怎么好几千啊？
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)--------------------------------------------Total: 4818.1ms +/- 2.7%--------------------------------------------

作者: q8508488 时间: 2012-6-18 13:09
，，我测试有问题吗？怎么好几千啊？
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)--------------------------------------------Total: 4818.1ms +/- 2.7%--------------------------------------------

作者: eternal0 时间: 2012-6-18 13:48

q8508488 发表于 2012-6-18 13:09
，，我测试有问题吗？怎么好几千啊？
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)-------------------- ...

浏览器、机器配置？

作者: eternal0 时间: 2012-6-18 13:50
Q6600 3.1G
IE9
221.9
FireFox Nightly 16.0a1 x64
232.1

E8500 3.16G
IE9
204.1
FireFox Nightly 16.0a1
194.2
Chrome 19
200.8
Opera 11.64
244.3

Mac i5 2400S 2.5G
Safari 5.1.7
158.5
FireFox 13.0
178.9
Chrome 19
179.6
Opera 11.64
224.6

iPad2
iOS 5.1.1 Safari
1807.0

看来去年iMac最低配的2400S单核性能都有iPad2 A5处理器的11.4倍之多。

作者: langke2 时间: 2012-6-18 14:38
2代核心的差距。除了频率还有命中率。就像机关枪扫射和狙击的差别。

作者: daijun5588 时间: 2012-6-18 15:02
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                153.4ms +/- 0.9%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                23.6ms +/- 2.1%
cube:             7.1ms +/- 3.2%
morph:             7.2ms +/- 4.2%
raytrace:          9.3ms +/- 3.7%

  access:             13.0ms +/- 5.8%
binary-trees:       1.0ms +/- 0.0%
fannkuch:          6.3ms +/- 5.5%
nbody:             3.4ms +/- 10.9%
nsieve:             2.3ms +/- 15.0%

  bitops:             12.2ms +/- 8.6%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 0.9ms +/- 25.1%
bits-in-byte:       3.7ms +/- 9.3%
bitwise-and:       2.8ms +/- 10.8%
nsieve-bits:       4.8ms +/- 6.3%

  controlflow:          1.4ms +/- 26.4%
recursive:          1.4ms +/- 26.4%

  crypto:             13.1ms +/- 1.7%
aes:                5.1ms +/- 4.4%
md5:                4.0ms +/- 0.0%
sha1:             4.0ms +/- 0.0%

  date:                13.5ms +/- 2.8%
format-tofte:       7.5ms +/- 5.0%
format-xparb:       6.0ms +/- 0.0%

  math:                12.0ms +/- 4.9%
cordic:             2.0ms +/- 0.0%
partial-sums:       7.5ms +/- 5.0%
spectral-norm:    2.5ms +/- 15.1%

  regexp:             6.0ms +/- 0.0%
dna:                6.0ms +/- 0.0%

  string:             58.6ms +/- 0.6%
base64:             4.1ms +/- 5.5%
fasta:             6.7ms +/- 5.2%
tagcloud:          16.9ms +/- 1.3%
unpack-code:       22.6ms +/- 1.6%
validate-input:    8.3ms +/- 4.2%

作者: acqwer 时间: 2012-6-18 15:16

q8508488 发表于 2012-6-18 13:09
，，我测试有问题吗？怎么好几千啊？
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)-------------------- ...

IE除了IE9在这个测试里面都是笑话。

作者: q8508488 时间: 2012-6-18 15:53
...哦。晕死。我用的360浏览器。

作者: solidus_sh 时间: 2012-6-18 22:58
I7 2600K 4.1G,win7 64
IE9: 126.3ms +/- 0.6%
Chrome 19: 124.8ms +/- 0.8%

T9500 2.6G win7 64
Chrome 19: 242ms

怎么测都是IE9慢

作者: slr 时间: 2012-6-20 00:55
楼主的E84肯定不正常，艹上去比单核心没差太远的

作者: jdsgnl 时间: 2012-6-20 13:05
amd X4 945 3.0GHz
2x2G DDR3 1333
IE 9_x64
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                1148.4ms +/- 1.1%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                158.2ms +/- 3.9%
cube:             60.9ms +/- 7.8%
morph:             31.6ms +/- 1.2%
raytrace:          65.7ms +/- 2.0%

  access:             226.2ms +/- 1.6%
binary-trees:       33.2ms +/- 0.9%
fannkuch:          88.0ms +/- 0.0%
nbody:             75.0ms +/- 4.7%
nsieve:             30.0ms +/- 0.0%

  bitops:             199.0ms +/- 0.2%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 37.9ms +/- 0.6%
bits-in-byte:       44.1ms +/- 0.5%
bitwise-and:       66.0ms +/- 0.0%
nsieve-bits:       51.0ms +/- 0.0%

  controlflow:          46.0ms +/- 0.0%
recursive:          46.0ms +/- 0.0%

  crypto:             115.4ms +/- 0.3%
aes:                37.0ms +/- 0.0%
md5:                38.0ms +/- 0.0%
sha1:             40.4ms +/- 0.9%

  date:                70.9ms +/- 0.6%
format-tofte:       36.0ms +/- 0.0%
format-xparb:       34.9ms +/- 1.2%

  math:                127.8ms +/- 1.2%
cordic:             15.0ms +/- 0.0%
partial-sums:       63.2ms +/- 2.1%
spectral-norm:    49.6ms +/- 1.4%

  regexp:                9.4ms +/- 11.4%
dna:                9.4ms +/- 11.4%

  string:             195.5ms +/- 0.4%
base64:             30.8ms +/- 1.0%
fasta:             53.2ms +/- 0.6%
tagcloud:          43.2ms +/- 1.0%
unpack-code:       34.3ms +/- 1.4%
validate-input:    34.0ms +/- 1.0%

我承认AMD的确是弱,但是有这个么弱吗?

欢迎光临 POPPUR爱换 (https://we.poppur.com/)