POPPUR爱换

标题: 冰山金蝶430和AU400应该选哪个? [打印本页]

作者: roby    时间: 2012-10-8 15:25
标题: 冰山金蝶430和AU400应该选哪个?
需要个400W左右的电源,这两款电源价格差不多,都是金牌,哪个更好一些?

作者: 222cd    时间: 2012-10-8 15:32
AU400
作者: roby    时间: 2012-10-8 15:42
222cd 发表于 2012-10-8 15:32
AU400

谢谢版主哈

作者: bugbear    时间: 2012-10-8 19:51
金蝶430性价比更高
作者: roby    时间: 2012-10-8 20:36
bugbear 发表于 2012-10-8 19:51
金蝶430性价比更高

价格倒是差不多,性能哪个好选哪个了

作者: bugbear    时间: 2012-10-8 20:46
roby 发表于 2012-10-8 20:36
价格倒是差不多,性能哪个好选哪个了

金蝶400-450w口碑还算不错

价格金蝶还是便宜点,建议直接买450w超频版的吧(实际550w都没问题)。



作者: roby    时间: 2012-10-8 20:50
bugbear 发表于 2012-10-8 20:46
金蝶400-450w口碑还算不错

价格金蝶还是便宜点,建议直接买450w超频版的吧(实际550w都没问题)。

某东上没看到有450超频版啊,金蝶430和450暗黑版有啥区别?多谢指教哈

作者: 222cd    时间: 2012-10-8 21:40
金蝶本坛和隔壁最近已经爆了三个了..................
作者: tang251    时间: 2012-10-8 21:58
金蝶貌似评价不怎么样
作者: roby    时间: 2012-10-8 22:05
222cd 发表于 2012-10-8 21:40
金蝶本坛和隔壁最近已经爆了三个了..................

这气场也太强大了

作者: bugbear    时间: 2012-10-9 07:39
roby 发表于 2012-10-8 20:50
某东上没看到有450超频版啊,金蝶430和450暗黑版有啥区别?多谢指教哈

偶都是在淘宝买,jd只买过2次

淘宝这两个电源,金蝶的便宜点

我手里有个第一版450w,和350w。

450w的跑双卡100%负载一天都没事,平时24*7,ups带,没碰过问题

振华就是做工难看了点

作者: bugbear    时间: 2012-10-9 07:47
roby 发表于 2012-10-8 20:50
某东上没看到有450超频版啊,金蝶430和450暗黑版有啥区别?多谢指教哈

暗黑版应该是缩了点,比超频版便宜200呢,淘宝暗黑390,超频590

80金牌的电源没有特差的,jd的话你挑个保修长的买吧

作者: roby    时间: 2012-10-9 12:50
bugbear 发表于 2012-10-9 07:47
暗黑版应该是缩了点,比超频版便宜200呢,淘宝暗黑390,超频590

80金牌的电源没有特差的,jd的话你挑个 ...

电源这东西,最重要稳定,就怕挂了还带几个垫背的……

作者: roby    时间: 2012-10-9 13:01
222cd 发表于 2012-10-8 21:40
金蝶本坛和隔壁最近已经爆了三个了..................

看到安钛克的EA550d卖430,这个怎么样呢?

作者: 222cd    时间: 2012-10-9 13:48
roby 发表于 2012-10-9 13:01
看到安钛克的EA550d卖430,这个怎么样呢?

哪家在卖?
作者: roby    时间: 2012-10-9 13:57
222cd 发表于 2012-10-9 13:48
哪家在卖?

舔毛上antec那个旗舰店的,可靠吗?

作者: roby    时间: 2012-10-9 13:59
打错了,是EA500D
作者: 222cd    时间: 2012-10-9 14:18
roby 发表于 2012-10-9 13:59
打错了,是EA500D[sweatingbullets>

这款不推荐,老型号了,波纹比较高...................
作者: zhangnuannuan    时间: 2012-10-9 14:21
roby 发表于 2012-10-9 13:59
打错了,是EA500D[sweatingbullets>

金蝶的超频版目前已经停产,可以选择GX效能版的,暗黑就算了也差不了多少钱,用料就差很多,AU400也是可以的
作者: roby    时间: 2012-10-9 14:21
222cd 发表于 2012-10-9 14:18
这款不推荐,老型号了,波纹比较高...................

看来这个价位就AU了

作者: bugbear    时间: 2012-10-9 14:44
roby 发表于 2012-10-9 12:50
[thumbsup>电源这东西,最重要稳定,就怕挂了还带几个垫背的……

能拿80金牌的,能符合intel规范的,这点还做不到么?

振华最早把80拉入平民价位,500w以内同价位,现在振华性价比还是挺高的

再说,原来一堆说llc怎么怎么不好的,llc不照样大卖么,电脑硬件自身供电设计也不是吃干饭的

只要不是山寨、二手、拆机的80金牌,就没必要担心这些问题。

作者: 222cd    时间: 2012-10-9 15:42
80PLUS金牌只代表转换效率,不代表产品合格.....................
作者: roby    时间: 2012-10-9 18:36
222cd 发表于 2012-10-9 15:42
80PLUS金牌只代表转换效率,不代表产品合格.....................

某东现在特价那个贼船GS600怎么样呢?

作者: 222cd    时间: 2012-10-9 20:33
roby 发表于 2012-10-9 18:36
某东现在特价那个贼船GS600怎么样呢?

新版GS600是CWT双管正激+同步整流+DC-DC方案,不错的电源

http://www.planet3dnow.de/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=406682&garpg=4

作者: roby    时间: 2012-10-9 21:04
222cd 发表于 2012-10-9 20:33
新版GS600是CWT双管正激+同步整流+DC-DC方案,不错的电源

http://www.planet3dnow.de/vbulletin/showt ...

学习了

作者: 乌鸦2000    时间: 2012-10-10 09:00
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: bugbear    时间: 2012-10-10 09:12
222cd 发表于 2012-10-9 15:42
80PLUS金牌只代表转换效率,不代表产品合格.....................

电源第一要过的是intel的标准,第二才是80金牌

这两个都过的,没有太烂的产品

有80金牌的比无牌和白牌的要好很多,这点你不否认吧。



作者: bugbear    时间: 2012-10-10 09:13
乌鸦2000 发表于 2012-10-10 09:00
80PLUS是一个整体认证吧。再说,能做到这个程度的电源不合格?请举例。

这就和说,经过宇航员食品认证 ...

同意

如果有谁能过80金牌但是比无牌做的还烂,那他就是神

作者: 222cd    时间: 2012-10-10 09:59
本帖最后由 222cd 于 2012-10-10 10:00 编辑
乌鸦2000 发表于 2012-10-10 09:00
80PLUS是一个整体认证吧。再说,能做到这个程度的电源不合格?请举例。

这就和说,经过宇航员食品认证 ...


过了80PLUS,但不合格的电源多的是

随便举个例子吧,80PLUS金牌是吧,也有不合格的

http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/OCZ-Z-Series-1000-W-Power-Supply-Review/942/7

作者: 222cd    时间: 2012-10-10 10:08
本帖最后由 222cd 于 2012-10-10 10:25 编辑

超级花还有白金牌5VSB不合格的呢,更不用说大陆市面上那些不敢送测的货

http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/a ... upply-Review/1626/7
作者: bugbear    时间: 2012-10-10 19:06
222cd 发表于 2012-10-10 10:08
超级花还有白金牌5VSB不合格的呢,更不用说大陆市面上那些不敢送测的货

http://www.hardwaresecrets.com ...

+5vsb是用来唤醒的,关机时候才用的...

你100%负载+5vsb没有啥用

你看看下面fail的解释,还有最后总结,评价是性价比很高,可惜不在us卖...

另外这都是在110v下测的,220v下成绩会更好

ocz那个同理,intel atx标准越来越注重+12v和效率,其它都变次要了。

看看下面这几年标准的变化就知道了。

Original ATX
ATX, introduced in late 1995, defined three types of power connectors:
The power distribution specification defined that most of the PSU's power should be provided on 5 V and 3.3 V rails, because most of the electronic components (CPU, RAM, chipset, PCI, AGP and ISA cards) used 5 V or 3.3 V for power supply. The 12 V rail was only used by fans and motors of peripheral devices (HDD, FDD, CD-ROM, etc.).
The original ATX power supply specification was little revised until 2000.
[edit] ATX12V 1.xWhile designing the Pentium 4 platform in 1999/2000, the standard 20-pin ATX power connector was found insufficient to meet increasing power-line requirements; the standard was significantly revised into ATX12V 1.0 (ATX12V 1.x is sometimes inaccurately called ATX-P4). ATX12V 1.x was also adopted by AMD Athlon XP and Athlon 64 systems. However, some early model Athlon XP and MP boards (including some server boards) and later model lower-end motherboards do not have the 4-pin connector as described below.
[edit] ATX12V 1.0The main changes and additions in ATX12V 1.0 (released in February 2000) were:
Before the Pentium 4, processors were generally powered from the 5V rail. Later processors operate at much lower voltages, typically around 1 V, and some draw over 100 A. It is infeasible to provide power at such low voltages and high currents from a standard system power supply, so the Pentium 4 established the practice of generating it with a DC-to-DC converter on the motherboard next to the processor, powered by the 4-pin 12V connector.
[edit] ATX12V 1.1This is a minor revision from August 2000. The power on the 3.3 V rail was slightly increased, and other smaller changes were made.
[edit] ATX12V 1.2A relatively minor revision from January 2002. The only significant change was that the −5 V rail was no longer required (it became optional). This voltage was used only on some old systems with certain ISA add-on cards.
[edit] ATX12V 1.3Introduced in April 2003 (a month after 2.0). This standard introduced some changes, mostly minor. Some of them are:
[edit] ATX12V 2.xATX12V 2.x brought a very significant design change regarding power distribution. On analyzing the then-current PC architecture's power demands, it was determined that it would be much cheaper and more practical to power most PC components from 12 V rails, instead of from 3.3 V and 5 V rails.
[edit] ATX12V 2.0
ATX 450 PHF.


The above conclusion was incorporated in ATX12V 2.0 (introduced in February 2003), which defined quite different power distribution from ATX12V 1.x:
[edit] ATX12V v2.01This is a minor revision from June 2004. An errant reference for the -5V rail was removed. Other minor changes were introduced.
[edit] ATX12V v2.1This is a minor revision from March 2005. The power was slightly increased on all rails. Efficiency requirements changed. Added 6-pin connector for PCIe graphics cards that aids the PCIe slot in the motherboard, delivering 75 watts.
[edit] ATX12V v2.2Another minor revision. Added 8-pin connector for PCIe graphics cards that delivers another 150 watts.
[edit] ATX12V v2.3Effective March 2007 and current as of 2012[update]. Recommended efficiency was increased to 80% (with at least 70% required), and the 12 V minimum load requirement was lowered. Higher efficiency generally results in less power consumption (and less waste heat), and the 80% recommendation brings supplies in line with new Energy Star 4.0 mandates.[14] The reduced load requirement allows compatibility with processors that draw very little power during startup.[15] The absolute over-current limit of 240VA per rail was removed, allowing 12V lines to provide more than 20A per rail.

作者: bugbear    时间: 2012-10-10 19:09
222cd 发表于 2012-10-10 10:08
超级花还有白金牌5VSB不合格的呢,更不用说大陆市面上那些不敢送测的货

http://www.hardwaresecrets.com ...

都知道电源是暴利产品,买就是买个性价比,保证供电安全和转换效率的情况下,越便宜越好

主板供电也不是吃素的

作者: Z魔王    时间: 2012-10-10 19:23
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: johngoo    时间: 2012-10-10 19:28
AU400吧,AU系列在隔壁评价也是不错的




欢迎光临 POPPUR爱换 (https://we.poppur.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.4