POPPUR爱换

标题: Crysis SP Demo Performance Analysis by Tweakdown [打印本页]

作者: samsung    时间: 2007-10-28 04:45
标题: Crysis SP Demo Performance Analysis by Tweakdown
http://www.tweaktown.com/article ... _results/index.html













作者: 来不及思考    时间: 2007-10-28 05:05
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: cxasuka    时间: 2007-10-28 08:27
= =~~~~~~512显存成必须了~~~~~~~
作者: 菊花一寒    时间: 2007-10-28 08:32
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: 萤火虫    时间: 2007-10-28 08:58
256显存的8600GTS和2600XT差不多鸟
作者: 就是不爱思考    时间: 2007-10-28 10:53
8800GT GOOD:wub: :wub:
作者: eoc    时间: 2007-10-28 10:59
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: phk    时间: 2007-10-28 12:09
标题: 【事实胜于狡辩】Crysis Demo Performance Analysis
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/1211/2/page_2_benchmark_results/index.html

Test System Setup

Processor(s):
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3GHz (333MHz x 9)
Cooling: Corsair Nautilus500 (Supplied by
Corsair) with Arctic Cooling MX-2 Thermal Compound (Supplied by Arctic Cooling)
Motherboard(s): ASUS Blitz Extreme (Supplied by
ASUS)
Memory: 2 X 1GB Corsair XMS3 DDR-3 1066MHz 7-7-7-21 (Supplied by
Corsair)
Hard Disk(s): Hitachi 80GB 7200RPM SATA-2
Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP2
Drivers: Catalyst 7.10 and Forceware 169.01



Benchmark Results


1280 x 1024




We can see that the HD 2900 XT 1GB GDDR4 model offers nothing over the 512MB GDDR3 model. Performance for the HD 2900 XT also sits between the 8800GTS and the newly released 8800GT. The top three spots are all taken up by NVIDIA with the Ultra coming out on top which is no surprise. At medium settings there also isn’t much that separates the three. It’s only at high we see the cards separate a bit more.


1680 x 1050




Moving up to that 22” wide screen resolution which has become so popular these days, we paint a very similar picture. HD 2900 cards sit between the GTS and GT 8800 variants. The 8600GTS and HD 2600 XT don’t give us anything at all to get excited about at both settings. The same three cards sit at the top again with all of them breaking a 50 FPS average at the medium settings at this resolution.


1920 x 1200




Since only the NVIDIA cards offer 1920 x 1200 that’s all that’s been tested here; and while the 8600GTS does offer it, given the numbers it was spitting out at 1680 x 1050 we didn’t think we would waste our time. The Ultra is able to crack 50FPS at medium at this resolution while the GTX and GT sit at the mid 40FPS mark and the GTS sits closer to the mid 30s.




作者: 御风子    时间: 2007-10-28 12:11
坐稳沙发慢慢看。:lol:
作者: UX201A    时间: 2007-10-28 12:13
ATI的2600XT不错嘛
赶上8600GTS了:w00t):
作者: 明镜止水    时间: 2007-10-28 12:13
还是等D8E  R680这些才跑得爽了呵呵

8800GT不错:p
作者: phk    时间: 2007-10-28 12:15
某 乞 丐 Q 在 吹 嘘 水 彩 画 的DX11,真 是 小 丑 极 品 啊
作者: phk    时间: 2007-10-28 12:18
各位,用不用我使用乞 丐Q的ALL MAX上一上图?只要你们愿意,我将这又肥又蠢的Q太阳掉
作者: Gfreeman    时间: 2007-10-28 12:19
这个测试成绩怎么这么高呢?!离谱了吧,在我的N卡上跑不到那么快:funk:
作者: phk    时间: 2007-10-28 12:23
太阳出来了




欢迎光临 POPPUR爱换 (https://we.poppur.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.4