最强硬件最新驱动最悍游戏最牛系统A/N大比试！

niwei

业界著名测试网站XBIT为我们带来了这次测试,对目前的PC游戏玩家有很强的借鉴意义，值得一看！

测试条件和方法：

We are going to investigate the performance of new ATI and Nvidia graphics card drivers in contemporary gaming titles running under Windows 7 using the following testbed:

Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition processor (3.2 GHz, 6.4 GT/s QPI);   Gigabyte GA-EX58-Extreme mainboard (Intel X58 Express chipset); Corsair XMS3-12800C9 (3 x 2 GB, 1333 MHz, 9-9-9-24, 2T); Maxtor MaXLine III 7B250S0 HDD (250 GB, Serial ATA-150, 16 MB buffer); Enermax Galaxy DXX EGX1000EWL 1000 W power supply; Dell 3007WFP monitor (30", 2560x1600 @ 60 Hz max display resolution); Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate SP2 64-bit; Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate RC1; ATI Catalyst 9.7 for ATI Radeon HD;
• Nvidia GeForce 190.38 WHQL for Nvidia GeForce.

The graphics card drivers were configured in the following way:
ATI Catalyst:

Smoothvision HD: Anti-Aliasing: Use application settings/Box Filter Catalyst A.I.: Standard Mipmap Detail Level: High Quality Wait for vertical refresh: Always Off Enable Adaptive Anti-Aliasing: On/Quality
• Other settings: default

Nvidia GeForce:

Texture filtering – Quality: High quality Texture filtering – Trilinear optimization: Off Texture filtering – Anisotropic sample optimization: Off Threaded optimization: Auto Vertical sync: Force off Antialiasing - Gamma correction: On Antialiasing - Transparency: Multisampling Multi-GPU performance mode: NVIDIA recommended Multi-display mixed-GPU acceleration: Multiple display performance mode Set PhysX GPU acceleration: Enabled Ambient Occlusion: Off
• Other settings: default

The list of benchmarks includes the following gaming titles and synthetic tests:
First-Person 3D Shooters

Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood Crysis Warhead Enemy Territory: Quake Wars Far Cry 2 F.E.A.R 2: Project Origin Left 4 Dead
• S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky

Third-Person 3D Shooters

Devil May Cry 4
• Prince of Persia

RPG

• Fallout 3

Simulators

Race Driver: GRID
• Tom Clancy's H.A.W.X.

Strategies

BattleForge
• World in Conflict: Soviet Assault

Semi-synthetic Benchmarks

• Futuremark 3DMark Vantage

We selected the highest possible level of detail in each game using standard tools provided by the game itself from the gaming menu. The games configuration files weren’t modified in any way, because the ordinary user doesn’t have to know how to do it. We made a few exceptions for selected games if that was necessary. We are going to specifically dwell on each exception like that later on in our article. Unfortunately, we couldn’t complete our performance tests in Call of Duty: World at War because the game version e had at our disposal worked incorrectly under Windows 7 and wouldn’t let us launch a single-user scenario.
We took one single-processor and one dual-processor graphics solution from each camp. Here are the graphics cards that will participate in our today’s test session:

ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 (2 x RV770, 750/750/3600 MHz, 1600 sp, 80 tmu, 32 rbe, 2 x 256-bit, 2 x 1024 MB GDDR5) ATI Radeon HD 4890 (RV790, 850/850/3900 MHz, 800 sp, 40 tmu, 16 rbe, 256-bit, 1024 MB GDDR5) Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 (2 x G200b, 576/1242/1998 MHz, 480 sp, 160 tmu, 56 rbe, 2x448-bit, 2 x 896 MB GDDR3)
• Nvidia GeForce GTX 275 (G200b, 633/1404/2328 MHz, 240 sp, 80 tmu, 28 rbe, 448-bit, 896 MB GDDR3)

We ran our tests in the following resolutions: 1280x1024, 1680x1050, 1920x1200 and 2560x1600. Everywhere, where it was possible we added MSAA 4x antialiasing to the standard anisotropic filtering 16x. We enabled antialiasing from the game’s menu. If this was not possible, we forced them using the appropriate driver settings of ATI Catalyst and Nvidia GeForce drivers.
Performance was measured with the games’ own tools and the original demos were recorded if possible. We measured not only the average speed, but also the minimum speed of the cards where possible. Otherwise, the performance was measured manually with Fraps utility version 2.9.8. In the latter case we ran the test three times and took the average of the three for the performance charts.

游戏测试者把该开的特效都开到TOP!这是真正考验VPU的时刻，驱动也是对阵双方最新的。采用VISTA,WIN7最新系统测试，XP被无情的抛弃。所用游戏都是目前最具代表性的大作，唯一的遗憾是没加入AMRA2的测试。以下是测试结果：


NO.1:Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood:




NO.2:Crysis Warhead



NO.3:Far Cry 2



NO.4:F.E.A.R 2: Project Origin





NO.5:Left 4 Dead(ATI DX10.1/ NV DX10)




NO.6:S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky (ATI DX10.1/NV DX10)




NO.7:Devil MayCry 4
  



NO.8:Prince of Persia
  



NO.9:Fallout 3




NO.10:Race Driver: GRID



NO.11:Tom Clancy's H.A.W.X.'



NO.12:World in Conflict: Soviet Assault



NO.13:BattleForge

niwei

漏了一个，QUAKE WAR,补上！


3dv就不贴，完全失去了比较的意义~

321321

鸟语不好，完全看不懂，打酱油的飘过

wayp2000

看的眼花，LZ总结下吧

niwei

这种测试没什么好总结的，一般直接看图表即可分清形势。

个人感觉，SLI在驱动层还是做得比交火多。

Elvis

这些看看也就算了。目前4830级别以上的显卡，基本满足所有需要

coffilk

看样子7下面比vista表现要好

八角差开

原来A粉也看xbitlabs
dx10.1的hawx已被攻陷，不是枪网么？

talou

主要的用意是在推广win7

hilaobing

这些看看也就算了。目前4830级别以上的显卡，基本满足所有需要
Elvis 发表于 2009-7-27 03:42

说的是，谁用得到那些变态分辨率。觉得这一代中端显卡还是很够用了

66666

就是太热了，满载动不动上70

niwei

这些看看也就算了。目前4830级别以上的显卡，基本满足所有需要
Elvis 发表于 2009-7-27 03:42

弹头，晴空，AMRA2等就不行~

niwei

原来A粉也看xbitlabs
dx10.1的hawx已被攻陷，不是枪网么？
八角差开 发表于 2009-7-27 05:19

N卡在鹰击长空游戏菜单里有DX10.1选项了？XBITLABS一直看，谁吃饱了撑得看网站还分A/N,那不有病！

Michal

4890似乎赶上来了，285和275差距比价格差距小太多了

luckyps

图表 全是图表

kdua

看出来了：半斤八两。

欧阳辰

其实都差不多....

    难道有260+能跑得欢的.4890跑不了?

   物理就不要提了,我还记得某神贴图,他的不知某型号N卡开物理后帧数直接降到个位数.

sexarmy119

看了一半有点晕..