|
facts so far:
1) #470 >> #480
2) 470 & 480 have limit availability 4 weeks after launch
3) 470 MRSP = $349
4) NV has 70+% TSMC 40nm capacity
5) GT21x has 40+% margin
6) 58xx selling at a premium
7) About 100 fermi chips per wafer
-------------------------------------------------
If 470 & 480 has 60+% of GT21x margin, i.e. 24+% margin, the overall margin (due to tesla 65+% margin) could be 35+%, in this case, it is worth reducing GT21x volume (meanwhile gaining highend market share), thus we should have seen large volume of fermi by now, contradicting to 2). Conclusion 1: Fermi's margin is less than 60% of GT21x margin.
Given 6, Fermi's margin should not be very low. Thus, a reasonable guess of 20%.
Now assume 25% channel margin (including service cost), 349*25% = $87. Per chip nv is selling 470 at 349 - 87 = $262. Applying 20% margin, per card cost = $210. Assume $85 board & memory cost, gtx470 per chip cost = 210 - 85 = $125.
Assume 80% wafer cost ($5k) is by 470, #470/wafer = 5k*0.8/0.125 = 32.
Given 1), #470 : #480 = 4 : 1 looks reasonable, thus 8 480 per wafer. If the tesla chip yield is similar to 480, another 8 per wafer. Therefore, 8 + 8 + 32 = 48 chips per wafer.
Conclusion 2: Given 7), the real fermi yield is 48%.
Although 48% is only a result after some calculations, it is based on all the above facts, thus won't deviate from the real number too much. Moreover, gtx460 could add a few more percentage to fermi's overall yield.
Any predict of 20-30% overall fermi yield is a lie. BTW, many newbies feel that AMD/ATI should lower their 58xx/57xx prices because they believe AMD has a lot of room for a price war. But the fact is AMD graphic profit Q1 2010 = 47 millons, and sold 4 million DX11 units, say, 1 million 58xx, 3 million 57xx/56xx/55xx. If AMD only lower 25$ per 58xx and 10$ per 57xx/56xx/55xx, AMD's graphic division would end up with a - 8 million profit. |
|