I3 540小超4.6玩网游是不是最给力的？

hksega · 发表于 2011-2-18 18:42

本帖最后由 hksega 于 2011-2-18 19:13 编辑

I3 540小超4.6玩网游是不是最给力的？4核心好像也没有提升吧

zdnexus · 发表于 2011-2-18 18:53

VID真低。。。。

1234chgm · 发表于 2011-2-18 18:56

用哪块板子超的？

lzjery · 发表于 2011-2-18 19:18

这年头还有人玩网游，不会多开的？

neogqf · 发表于 2011-2-18 20:16

i3什么时候4核了

花泥 · 发表于 2011-2-18 20:33

悲剧，我那块530上4,7g跑个pi都要1.47v了

只看该作者 · 发表于 2011-2-18 20:37

提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

mit0451 · 发表于 2011-2-18 23:09

orz,你这电压。再加点压破5g应该没问题。

yuhiyu · 发表于 2011-2-19 02:15

来个默电最高频率

aikesi · 发表于 2011-2-19 13:13

i3超一下还是蛮给力的，我没这么心黑，就3.8G，准备长期用的频率

zergzx · 发表于 2011-2-19 16:48

I3就是要4.5G以上用，只是看RP好坏电压高低而已

denimpowell · 发表于 2011-2-19 23:18

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/CPU/62 自己去看评测同频下的2.8G的i5 都是 3.0G i3 115% 这还是在wow这种只支持双核cpu的游戏中

Ephyer · 发表于 2011-2-20 00:06

本帖最后由 Ephyer 于 2011-2-20 00:07 编辑

4核或许没用，但是更大的L3核更快的内存速度，I3赶不上的。

12楼wow图里,I3和双核I5，和4核i5,i7比，差距相当大啊，是不是一起关掉HT再测测，不然里面好多诡异现象。

norika_1984 · 发表于 2011-2-20 12:18

Ephyer 发表于 2011-2-20 00:06
4核或许没用，但是更大的L3核更快的内存速度，I3赶不上的。

12楼wow图里,I3和双核I5，和4核i5,i7比，差距 ...

re...
而且I3单核的效率与I5差距也不小。

gdmk · 发表于 2011-2-20 12:34

跑一下对CPU非常依赖的而且只支持双核的ps2模拟器，就会发现双核i3，i5跟4核i5，i7单核效率相差巨大。
Fin**tasy X-2 (NTSC-US)
Thanks for all your effort overclocking your AMD CPUs as maximum as possible. However unfortunately we don't have AMD CPUs that is able to exceed 60 FPS for now. Well, feel free to challenge 60 FPS Today. Smile

Quote:100.00 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 2500K - 5.0 GHz OC - Rezard - CPU-Z Screenshot
96.97 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 2500K - 4.9 GHz OC - Rezard - CPU-Z Screenshot
93.84 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 2500K - 4.7 GHz OC - Rezard
90.14 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 2600K - 4.7 GHz OC - Hambone07si (non-member in this forum)
86.25 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 2600K - 4.4 GHz OC - Hambone07si (non-member in this forum)
81.42 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 920 - 4.4 GHz OC - Unr3al
81.22 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 2500K - 4.0 Ghz OC - Rezard
80.81 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 980X - 4.4 GHz OC - Hambone07si (non-member in this forum)
77.86 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 870 - 4.2 GHz OC (HT off) - hallmark - CPU-Z Screenshot
77.67 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 920 - 4.2 GHz OC - Unr3al - CPU-Z Screenshot
75.29 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 920 - 4.0 GHz OC - Unr3al - CPU-Z Screenshot
69.72 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 2500K - 3.3 Ghz Stock - Rezard
67.94 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 920 - 3.6 GHz OC - Master_DX
67.23 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i3 530 - 4.3 GHz OC - jmuuss - CPU-Z Validation
65.17 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i3 530 - 4.2 GHz OC - Butz_san
64.26 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i3 530 - 3.75 GHz OC - jmuuss - CPU-Z Validation
63.49 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 - 4.12 GHz OC - rama
63.24 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E6800 - 4.2 GHz OC - Bonobi - CPU-Z Screenshot
62.23 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i3 530 - 4.0 GHz OC - Butz_san
61.54 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 870 - 2.93 GHz Stock (HT On, Turbo On, Affinity 4,5,6,7) - hallmark
61.07 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i3 530 - 3.5 GHz OC - ilovejedd
60.84 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 650 - 3.6 GHz OC (Turbo Boost off) - ilovejedd

－－－－－－－－－－　The Boundary of 60 FPS　－－－－－－－－－－

59.70 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400 - 4.0 GHz OC - Shadow Lady
59.59 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 - 3.8 GHz OC - antespo - CPU-Z Validation
59.48 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 860 - 2.8 GHz Stock (Turbo Boost on, CPU affinity: 2 & 3) - ilovejedd
59.26 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Phenom II x4 955 - 3.96 GHz OC - Ryner Lute
59.13 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i3 530 - 3.67 GHz OC - Butz_san
58.72 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 870 - 2.93 GHz Stock (HT On, Turbo On) - hallmark
58.61 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 760 - 2.8 GHz Stock (Turbo Boost on, CPU affinity: 2 & 3) - ilovejedd
58.61 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 - 3.8 GHz OC - pcsx2fan - CPU-Z Validation
58.50 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 870 - 2.93 GHz Stock (HT Off, Turbo On) - hallmark
58.18 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E6800 - 3.8 GHz OC - Bonobi - CPU-Z Screenshot
58.08 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 650 - 3.2 GHz Stock (HT off, Turbo Boost on) - Rezard - CPU-Z
57.87 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 860 - 2.8 GHz Stock (Turbo Boost on) - ilovejedd
57.66 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Phenom II x4 955 - 3.8 GHz OC -Ryner Lute
57.04 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i3 530 - 3.3 GHz OC - ilovejedd
56.94 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 760 - 2.8 GHz Stock (Turbo Boost on) - ilovejedd
56.64 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Athlon II X2 250 - 3.8 GHz OC - denimu
56.44 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 650 - 3.2 GHz Stock (Turbo Boost on) - ilovejedd
54.98 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 - 3.52 GHz OC - cyber
54.89 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400 - 3.6 GHz OC - Shadow Lady
54.42 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 650 - 3.2 GHz Stock (HT on, Turbo Boost on) - Rezard - CPU-Z
54.24 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 650 - 3.2 GHz Stock (Turbo Boost off) - ilovejedd
54.05 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition - 3.6 GHz OC -denimu
53.87 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 3.33 GHz OC - Pedrosilvaa - CPU-Z Validation
53.69 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 - 3.73 GHz OC - tuanming
53.33 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Phenom II X6 1055T - 3.33 GHz OC - ilovejedd (Turbo Core on) - CPU-Z
53.16 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 870 - 2.93 GHz Stock (HT Off, Turbo Off) - hallmark
52.89 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 870 - 2.93 GHz Stock (HT On, Turbo Off) - hallmark
52.55 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 - 3.33 GHz Stock - ilovejedd
52.29 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Athlon II X2 250 - 3.6 GHz OC - denimu
51.95 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 860 - 2.8 GHz Stock (Turbo Boost off) - ilovejedd
51.86 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 3.21 GHz OC - Pedrosilvaa
51.70 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 760 - 2.8 GHz Stock (Turbo Boost off) - ilovejedd
51.04 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - 3.5 GHz OC - Shadow Lady
50.96 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E6800 - 3.33 GHz Stock - Bonobi - CPU-Z Screenshot
50.47 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i3 530 - 2.93 GHz Stock - ilovejedd
50.16 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Athlon II X2 245 - 3.6 GHz OC - CKL
49.46 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 3.10 GHz OC - Pedrosilvaa
49.46 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 - 3.16 GHz OC - pcsx2fan - CPU-Z Validation
49.16 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 920 - 2.66 GHz Stock - Unr3al - CPU-Z Screenshot
49.08 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i7 920 - 2.66 GHz Stock - Master_DX
48.41 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 - 3.00 GHz Stock - antespo
48.05 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Phenom II X6 1055T - 3.33 GHz OC - ilovejedd (Turbo Core off) - CPU-Z
47.69 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Phenom II x4 955 - 3.2 GHz Stock- Ryner Lute
47.06 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 - 3.00 GHz Stock - rama
46.44 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition - 3.2 GHz Stock -denimu
46.44 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Celeron E3300 - 3.33 GHz OC - ilovejedd - CPU-Z Validation
46.38 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 2.83 GHz Stock - Pedrosilvaa
45.98 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 460m - 2.53 GHz Stock (Turbo Boost off) - frost - CPU-Z Validation
46.14 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 - 3.00 GHz OC - prafull
44.38 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Athlon II X2 250 - 3.00 GHz Stock - denimu
43.78 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Phenom II X4 945 - 3021 MHz Stock- Abelus
43.30 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Phenom II X6 1055T - 2.80 GHz Stock (Turbo Core on) - ilovejedd
43.18 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 - 2.80 GHz Stock - Rezard - CPU-Z Screenshot
41.78 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 - 2.66 GHz Stock - prafull
40.97 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E6300 - 2.80 GHz - ilovejedd
40.46 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Athlon II X2 245 - 2.9 GHz Stock - CKL
40.20 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Phenom II X6 1055T - 2.80 GHz Stock (Turbo Core off) - ilovejedd
40.10 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 - 2.53 GHz Stock - pcsx2fan
40.05 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 - 2.50 GHz Stock - Chase_Payne
39.69 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400 - 2.7 GHz Stock - Shadow Lady
39.02 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 - 2.75 GHz OC (920MHz DDR2) - Shadow Lady
36.66 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - 2.6 GHz Stock - Shadow Lady
36.12 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 - 2.75 GHz OC (800MHz DDR2) - Shadow Lady
35.20 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Celeron Dual-Core E3300 - 2.5 GHz Stock - ilovejedd
33.48 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 - 2.1 GHz Stock - prafull
33.40 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ - 3.06 Ghz OC - Rezard - CPU-Z Screenshot
29.20 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ - 2.7 Ghz Stock - Rezard - CPU-Z Screenshot
27.63 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 - 1.86 GHz Stock - tuanming
27.30 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ - 2.7 GHz Stock- Abelus
26.19 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 - 1.6 GHz Underclocking - pcsx2fan
24.54 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 - 1.8 GHz Stock - Shadow Lady
23.38 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 - 1.5 GHz Stock - prafull
21.23 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 - 2.1 GHz Stock - Rezard - CPU-Z Screenshot
12.31 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Sempron II M120 - 2.10 GHz Stock - Rezard - CPU-Z Screenshot
9.44 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Sempron 3200+ - 1.8 GHz Stock - ilovejedd

xzyzy · 发表于 2011-2-20 18:16

网游你别忘了多开，而且新大型网游也对多核优化了

hyj201 · 发表于 2011-2-20 23:52

neogqf 发表于 2011-2-18 20:16
i3什么时候4核了

双核四线程而已

jarheart · 发表于 2011-2-21 10:56

线程4 2双核

dennyq · 发表于 2011-2-21 11:08

已经挺给力了，但是绝对不是最给力，I5,I7随便一草都比I3 4.6给力，还有SNB的I5，I7游戏性能更牛B，即使不超。

leeyuanxun · 发表于 2011-2-21 11:15

进来看看大雕

帐号		自动登录	找回密码
密码			注册

无品堂该用户已被删除	7^# 发表于 2011-2-18 20:37 \| 只看该作者提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽
无品堂该用户已被删除
	回复支持反对使用道具举报显身卡

I3 540小超4.6玩网游是不是最给力的？

本帖子中包含更多资源

浏览过的版块