由AMD的PR值想到的,INTEL在嘲讽AMD???

Yeuns

新的CONROE处理器的命名方式是在吵笑AMD的XXXX+ XXXX+之类命名方式的愚蠢。

E6700=AMD6700+:lol::charles:

其实E4200就超过AMD所唯的5000+了:wub:

L2S

AMD的PR值是和自家的雷鸟对比而来。

扣肉的是不是对比自家P4呢？

Songhaipeng

到底说的什么？~~~~~~~~~~~

Yeuns

原帖由 L2S 于 2006-6-5 16:49 发表
AMD的PR值是和自家的雷鸟对比而来。

扣肉的是不是对比自家P4呢？

为什么要对比雷鸟呢 和K6-2对比不是更有面子:shifty:可以叫50000+了

Edison

XEON 5160岂不是变成比E6700慢。

L2S

原帖由 Yeuns 于 2006-6-5 16:55 发表



为什么要对比雷鸟呢 和K6-2对比不是更有面子:shifty:可以叫50000+了

回顾下当时的历史。

打个比方：你出生时总是和父亲比长得有多像吧，总不见的隔代和爷爷或是曾祖父比w00t)

permediaX

AMD的PR是和自己的ATHLON（非XP）处理器比较的

Yeuns

原帖由 permediaX 于 2006-6-5 17:02 发表
AMD的PR是和自己的ATHLON（非XP）处理器比较的

这种说法只有没脑子的人和极端饭A者才会信吧

想想当年INTEL P4走频率路线 (还记的当年的P3和K7 GHZ世纪大战吗?)

后来P4把K7在频率上甩进死路了 AMD害怕吃哑吧亏才急急忙忙搞出了PR+

哈哈 没想到到了今天还是被INTEL羞辱了 还美其名曰和<自家的>雷鸟比:lol:


AMD好酸哦:p

micwolfpig

吵架贴
不过pr值确实是用来比较P4的

BabyFox

原帖由 CD真够烂 于 2006-6-5 17:22 发表
当初PR值刚面世时用在了Xp上，PR值与频率值相同时AlthonXp性能相对P4全面占优。1600+综合性能不会输给P4 1.7G

I饭要是认为PR值是和P4比，那倒是高估主子了。

不懂的话就多去找wikipedia看看吧，不过国内不知道能不能上 :lol:

其实我也不大懂，不过看完就懂了  :lol:

The PR rating system was developed by AMD in the mid-1990s as a method of comparing their x86 processors to those of rival Intel.

A response to Intel's marketing

The continuation of this practice, despite higher performance per clock, led consumers to conclude that AMD's Athlon XP processors, because they had much slower clock speeds than Intel's Pentium 4 processors, were inferior to Intel's Pentium 4 microprocessors. In reality, on a clock-for-clock basis, the Athlon XP microprocessor was superior to the Pentium 4 on a number of benchmarks. An Athlon XP with a 2 GHz clock would easily outperform a 2 GHz Pentium 4 on most benchmarks.

In reaction to the consumers' misconception, AMD reinstalled the PR rating to compare their Athlon XP microprocessors. AMD made sure to advertise the PR number of its microprocessors rather than their raw clock speeds believing that consumers would compare the PR of AMD's processors to the clock speed of Intel's processors. The PR number was originally believed to show the clock speed (in megahertz) of an equivalent Pentium 4 processor, but this was never confirmed by AMD. As part of its marketing, AMD even made sure that motherboard manufacturers conspicuously showed the PR number of the microprocessor in the motherboards' POST and not include the processors' clock speeds anywhere except within the BIOS.

L2S

原帖由 来不及思考 于 2006-6-6 16:24 发表

同样都是默认，2.4C日2500+跟切菜一样

那是P4发展了多代后出现的局面。

一开始AMD制定PR值时，又有谁能预测未来呢（包括I推出4G失败）

BabyFox

原帖由 CD真够烂 于 2006-6-6 15:21 发表


真的看懂了？:shifty:

好权威啊w00t)

:charles: 文中没有提到是和ThunderBird或是任何AMD的U比较的，确实是和Intel竞争出来的一个东西，一般认为是和Pentium系列比较的，不过AMD官方一向不承认是和Intel的比而已...这么解释满意了不？

wiki一向是很客观的....

balabalame

原帖由 莱茵钢铁 于 2006-6-6 16:41 发表

P4频率确实高啊 可INTEL为啥不发展了呢？哈哈 哈哈哈

AMD列举DDR2罪状种种 还扬言跨越DDR2直接DDR3

可为啥AMD还是上了DDR2呢？

哈哈 哈哈哈

:lol: