Conroe 2007小改款Penryn部分性能披露

Prescott

顺便抗议一下这个新版，难看的要死要死

http://techgage.com/article/beij ... ops_and_skulltrail/


More on Penryn

Intel touched on Penryn performance again, although the results are still very early. For their personal tests, they compared a current 2.93GHz Core QX6800 to a 45nm-based Penryn at 3.33GHz with 1333FSB with 12MB of cache. Right off the bat, this doesn't seem to be much of a fair comparison given the fact there is a CPU frequency bump as well as FSB. However what it does tell us though, is that thanks to 45nm, we will indeed be seeing higher stock clock speeds over what Conroe currently offers.

At any rate, the results given are as follows:

    * Unnamed 45nm 3.33GHz Quad-Core vs. QX6800 2.93GHz 15% faster for imaging-related applications
    * 25% faster for 3-D rendering
    * 40%+ faster for gaming
    * 40%+ faster for video encoding utilizing SSE4

Like most scenarios today, we can see that Penryn won't offer large performance increases for all applications, but can make huge differences for a select few. Video encoding and gaming showcased quite large differences. Applications they used included Half-Life 2 build 2707, Cinbench R9.5, MainConcept H.264 Encoder v2.1 and Photoshop CS2.




On the server side of things, you can expect up to 45% gains on bandwidth intensive applications (1333FSB Xeon) and 25% speed increases on Java-based servers (1600FSB Xeon).

That aside, I still find that a rather interesting comparison. It would have been more fair to compare two processors with equal frequencies, as I'm sure 3.33GHz will not be the lowest clocked Quad-Core in their Penryn line-up. Irregardless, it's still too early to speculate that much, but these results give hope of undeniable gains.

[ 本帖最后由 Prescott 于 2007-4-17 16:47 编辑 ]

elisha

提升一般啊
没有CSI，果然...

但是双核应该提升较大吧

acqwer

divx已经支持SSE4了吗？怎么提升这么多。

Albatron

原帖由 elisha 于 2007-4-17 16:43 发表
提升一般啊
没有CSI，果然...

但是双核应该提升较大吧

   * 25% faster for 3-D rendering
   * 40%+ faster for gaming
* 40%+ faster for video encoding utilizing SSE4

这样的提升叫一般？:ph34r:

hitmanu

不到一年就过时的货,出来时我看它怎么和到时183美金得xeon3210,以及266美金得qx6600斗,一些想收藏775接口最后一代的人,收藏一下不错.......
ps
价钱在183......到266还可以买客玩玩,可惜intel老大没这么慷慨.....

[ 本帖最后由 hitmanu 于 2007-4-17 16:51 编辑 ]

soft

还可以吧

记得这里曾经有某高人说过conroe架构能优化的都优化了，已经没有改进余地了
而k8还有很多改进余地
看来至少前半句说错了

mumuocer

应该把ＱＸ６８００超到３３３*１０，再比较一下

sxs112

應該把QX6800提升到3.33G比較會比較準...畢竟時脈還是差了400Mhz...

the_god_of_pig

磕个头膜拜一下，不服不行，I的作风就是不一样啊:lol:

没去现场，可惜了

soft

原帖由 天边的浮云 于 2007-4-17 17:35 发表
对INTEL就是牛 新U发布这么频繁  随便的一次又一次20% 30%提升性能

AMD憋了5年~弄个比K8同频性能高30%的U都弄不出来~

那么你觉得k8在制程转化过程中提升如何呢？

130nm->90nm->65nm

似乎目前超频的最高纪录还是130nm的fx55保持的
同频性能基本没什么变化
在65nm出之前也是很多人充满憧憬，觉得amd都这么长时间了肯定改进很大

lzy24

频率高14%的Penryn能有这样的性能提升还算不错了:lol: w00t)

colddawn

Intel真的是厚道,价格再厚道一点就更好了
顺便问一下P大有没有PRAM的相关资料？貌似这次IDF也有关于这个的讲座。