ATI Radeon HD 4670-----主流重新定位!

冰雨寒雪

ATI Radeon HD 4670, Redefining The MainstreamWednesday, September 10, 2008 - by Marco Chiappetta in Video


We have explained in numerous articles in the past that the bulk of GPU sales are made in the form of ether IGPs (Integrated Graphics Processors) or affordable, mainstream graphics cards.  As powerful and exciting as the ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 or GeForce  GTX 280 cards may be, AMD and NVIDIA simply don't sell as many flagship products as they do mainstream cards.

It is because of this fact that both companies consistently refresh their mainstream offerings every few months or so, and continually push new features and performance down their respective product lines.  As many of you may have expected, since AMD recently released the RV770 GPU, which is the foundation of the Radeon HD 4800 series, a new mainstream offering was obviously in the works.  And today, we can finally show that card to you.

AMD is releasing a new salvo of mainstream graphics cards that should fall in the sub-$80 price segment, dubbed the Radeon HD 4670.  The GPU at the heart of the 4670 is based on the RV770 architecture used on the Radeon HD 4800 series, sans a few stream processors, ROPs, and other assorted elements, but with what is essentially the same feature set as its more expensive counterparts.  We've got a couple of these new cards on hand and plan to show you what they're capable of on the pages ahead. After reading, you may be surprised by what 80 bucks can get you these days...


ATI Radeon HD 4670













测试平台及评测对象
Hardware Used:
Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (3GHz)
Asus Striker II Extreme
(nForce 790i SLI Ultra chipset)
Asus P5E3 Premium
(X48 Express)
Radeon HD 4670 x 2
Radeon HD 3650
Radeon HD 3850
GeForce 9500 GT
GeForce 8600 GTS
GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 9600 GSO

2048MB Corsair DDR3-1333 C7
(2 X 1GB)
Integrated Audio
Integrated Network

Western Digital "Raptor" 74GB
(10,000RPM - SATA)


Relevant Software:
Windows Vista Ultimate SP1
DirectX June 2008 Redist


NVIDIA Forceware v177.92 / v177.39
ATI Catalyst v8.53

Benchmarks Used:
3DMark06 v1.0.2
3DMark Vantage v1.0.1
Unreal Tournament 3 v1.2*
Crysis v1.2*
Half Life 2: Episode 2*
Enemy Territory: Quake Wars*

* - Custom Benchmark











Next we conducted a test using an H.264 encoded movie trailer clip for "Beowulf" which is available for download on Apple's QuickTime HD website.  The CPU utilization data gathered during these tests was taken from Windows Vista's built-in Performance Monitor. The graphs show the CPU utilization for a GeForce 9500 GT and a Radeon HD 4670 using PowerDVD 8 Ultra to playback the QuickTime clip.



  
GeForce 9500 GT




Radeon HD 4670





[ 本帖最后由 冰雨寒雪 于 2008-9-10 17:12 编辑 ]

palapin

游戏速度比3850快啊。

nom-soccery

原帖由 ghtfuo 于 2008-9-10 17:15 发表
期待单槽设计

本来就是单槽散热。

冰雨寒雪

原帖由 [请注意称呼用词。damparadise 于 2008-9-10 17:13 发表
这家网站测试的功耗和别家差距甚大

是主机总功耗,非显卡功耗!

nom-soccery

原帖由 liuqid 于 2008-9-10 17:21 发表
{lol:] {lol:] {lol:] {lol:] 功耗和9600GT一样。
看这些GUN们还怎么说

待机一样，全功率还是9600GT高。

Eindhoven

估计这家网站没开PP{lol:] {victory:]

0004312815

看来废掉9600GSO已经没有悬念了

Duncan

原帖由 liuqid 于 2008-9-10 17:26 发表
{biggrin:] {biggrin:] {biggrin:] 性能上依然被3850压着
没有意义

还被4850压着呢，不到60W的卡能有这样的表现你还想怎样{glare:]

feixiong

看样子nv今年年内日子不好过啊！nv加油，nv挺住!

sz_graham

{closedeyes:] 这个网站数据存疑啊  尤其是功耗这一块...

iamcabbage

既然都和96GT功耗差不多了 为什么不需要外接电源呢{lol:]
难道真的是火星科技{lol:]

freezee

和9600GT的性能还是有少少的差距啊，现在最关键的问题就是价格了~

nom-soccery

原帖由 freezee 于 2008-9-10 17:42 发表
和9600GT的性能还是有少少的差距啊，现在最关键的问题就是价格了~

如果9600GT都能卖到599以下，4670肯定被压制，可问题是NV有这个能力么？何况4670还可以继续压价到499，所以低端市场，NV基本丢了。

axelzq

说功耗的笑死人了，你96GSO 96GT 3850不接外接电源看看 {lol:]

原来4670跑分不行，游戏轻松搞定96GSO了{closedeyes:]

xboxdcps

还以为干的过9600,,结果不行

GMT+8

低端显卡要的就是实用，应该不会有人买块低端跑分YY吧……   
现在看来4670性能不错，足够压制96GSO了，就是这功耗看不懂了……

sifoniv

原帖由 hdht 于 2008-9-10 17:45 发表
低端市场？

笑话，低端独显市场百分之一百是nv的8500gt，你去看看低端的电脑城就知道了……

你这都是老黄历了，武汉中心电脑城亲一色的2600PRO，8600GT，3850。8500基本退市。

zblskj

原帖由 iamcabbage 于 2008-9-10 17:37 发表
既然都和96GT功耗差不多了 为什么不需要外接电源呢{lol:]
难道真的是火星科技{lol:]

boris_lee

我记得3850好像是不如96GSO的来着{blush:]