POPPUR爱换

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

手机号码,快捷登录

搜索
查看: 4063|回复: 30
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天河一号 A 被日本 “京” 爆掉

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2011-6-20 19:42 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
http://www.top500.org/lists/2011/06/press-release


Japan Reclaims Top Ranking on Latest TOP500 List of World’s Supercomputers
Thu, 2011-06-16 19:24

Contact: Erich Strohmaier, EStrohmaier@lbl.gov, 510-495-2517

HAMBURG, Germany—A Japanese supercomputer capable of performing more than 8 quadrillion calculations per second (petaflop/s) is the new number one system in the world, putting Japan back in the top spot for the first time since the Earth Simulator was dethroned in November 2004, according to the latest edition of the TOP500 List of the world’s top supercomputers. The system, called the K Computer, is at the RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science (AICS) in Kobe.

The 37th edition of the closely watched list was released Monday, June 20, at the 2011 International Supercomputing Conference in Hamburg. The ranking of all systems is based on how fast they run Linpack, a benchmark application developed to solve a dense system of linear equations.

For the first time, all of the top 10 systems achieved petaflop/s performance – and those are also the only petaflop/s systems on the list. The U.S. is tops in petaflop/s with five systems performing at that level; Japan and China have two each, and France has one.

Bumped to second place after capturing No. 1 on the previous list is the Tianhe-1A supercomputer the National Supercomputing Center in Tianjin, China, with a performance at 2.6 petaflop/s. Also moving down a notch was Jaguar, a Cray supercomputer at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Oak Ridge National Laboratory, at No. 3 with 1.75 petaflop/s.

Rounding out the Top 10 are Nebulae at China’s National Supercomputing Center in Shenzen (1.27 petaflop/s), Tsubame 2.0 at the Tokyo Institute of Technology (1.19 petaflop/s), Cielo at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico (1.11 petaflop/s), Pleiades at the NASA Ames Research Center in California (1.09 petaflop/s), Hopper at DOE’s National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) in California (1.054 petaflop/s), Tera 100 at the CEA (Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives) in France (1.05 petaflop/s), and Roadrunner at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico (1.04 petaflop/s).

The New Number One

The K Computer, built by Fujitsu, currently combines 68544 SPARC64 VIIIfx CPUs, each with eight cores, for a total of 548,352 cores—almost twice as many as any other system in the TOP500. The K Computer is also more powerful than the next five systems on the list combined.

The K Computer’s name draws upon the Japanese word "Kei" for 10^16 (ten quadrillions), representing the system's performance goal of 10 petaflops. RIKEN is the Institute for Physical and Chemical Research. Unlike the Chinese system it displaced from the No. 1 slot and other recent very large system, the K Computer does not use graphics processors or other accelerators. The K Computer is also one of the most energy-efficient systems on the list.
Some Other Highlights from the newest List

    The two Chinese systems at No. 2 and No. 4 and the Japanese Tsubame 2.0 system at No. 5 are all using NVIDIA GPUs to accelerate computation, and a total of 19 systems on the list are using GPU technology.
    China keeps increasing its number of systems and is now up to 62, making it clearly the No. 2 country as a user of HPC, ahead of Germany, UK, Japan and France.
    Intel continues to provide the processors for the largest share (77.4 percent) of TOP500 systems. Intel’s Westmere processors increased their presence in the list strongly with 169 systems, compared with 56 in the last list.
    Quad-core processors are used in 46.2 percent of the systems, while already 42.4 percent of the systems use processors with six or more cores.
    Cray defended the No. 2 spot in market share by total against Fujitsu, but IBM stays well ahead of either. Cray’s XT system series remains very popular for big research customers, with three systems in the TOP 10 (one new and two previously listed).

Tracking Changes

Since its launch in 1993, the TOP500 List has provided a consistent metric for evaluating the performance of supercomputers. This consistency has made the list a valuable tool for tracking changes in the industry, both over the years and from list to list. Here are some notable changes between the current list and the 36th edition, issued in November 2010.

    The entry level to the list moved up to the 40.1 Tflop/s mark on the Linpack benchmark, compared to 31.1 Tflop/s six months ago.
    The last system on the newest list was listed at position 262 six months ago. This turnover rate has steadily increased during the last few lists and is now above average.
    Total combined performance of all 500 systems has grown to 58.88 Pflop/s, compared to 43.7 Pflop/s six months ago and 32.4 Pflop/s one year ago.
    The average concurrency level in the TOP500 is 15,550 cores per system, up from 13,071 six months ago and 10,267 one year ago.
    The U.S. is the leading consumer of HPC systems with 256 of the 500 systems (down from 274). The European share (125 systems ) is still larger than the Asian share (103 systems – up from 84). Dominant countries in Asia are China with 62 systems (up from 42) and Japan with 26 systems (unchanged). In Europe, Germany, UK, and France are almost equal with 30 (26), 27 (24), and 25 (26) respectively.

Some Final Notes on Power Consumption

Just as the TOP500 List has emerged as a standardized indicator of performance and architecture trends since it was created 18 years ago, the list now tracks actual power consumption of supercomputers in a consistent fashion. Although power consumption is increasing, the computing efficiency of the systems is also improving. Here are some power consumption notes from the newest list.

    29 systems on the list are confirmed to use more than 1 megawatt (MW) of power.
    Average power efficiency is 248 Mflops/watt (up from 219 Mflops/watt six months ago and 195 Mflops/watt one year ago).
    The No. 1 system, the K Computer, also reports the highest total power consumption of 9.89 MW.
    Average power consumption of a TOP500 system is 543 KW (up from 447 KW six months ago and 397 KW one year ago).
    Average power consumption of a TOP 10 system is 4.3 MW (up from 3.2 MW six months ago), and average power efficiency is 464 Mflops/watt (up from 268 Mflops/watt six months ago).

About the TOP500 List

The TOP500 list is compiled by Hans Meuer of the University of Mannheim, Germany; Erich Strohmaier and Horst Simon of NERSC/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; and Jack Dongarra of the University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
2#
发表于 2011-6-20 19:43 | 只看该作者
老大,我承认我很懒,简单概括下吧
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

3#
发表于 2011-6-20 19:52 | 只看该作者
没有用GPU就能爆天河{:5_196:}
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

4#
发表于 2011-6-20 19:59 | 只看该作者
我擦,没有用显卡,超过天河1A三倍的运算力,效率还超过90%
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

5#
发表于 2011-6-20 21:00 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 66666 于 2011-6-20 21:08 编辑

接近7万个Sparc64 VIIIfx,45nm下跟费米大小差不多,性能大约有128Gflops,日本人还真是变态花这么高的代价。。。。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

6#
发表于 2011-6-20 21:12 | 只看该作者
voidshatter 发表于 2011-6-20 19:59
我擦,没有用显卡,超过天河1A三倍的运算力,效率还超过90%

CPU的效率就是高,这个没办法,现在SPARC CPU应该都是富士通生产了吧,也算日本自己生产的CPU,这点比我们拿intel的CPU和NV的GPU组装的天河强。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

7#
发表于 2011-6-20 21:16 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 Buffer 于 2011-6-20 21:28 编辑

我理解错了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

8#
发表于 2011-6-20 21:25 | 只看该作者
{lol:]全是自产的
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

9#
发表于 2011-6-20 22:16 | 只看该作者
8p,至少**是第一个使用gpu拿到第一的
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

potomac 该用户已被删除
10#
发表于 2011-6-20 22:35 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

11#
发表于 2011-6-20 22:39 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 asdfjkl 于 2011-6-20 22:40 编辑
Edison 发表于 2011-6-20 19:42
http://www.top500.org/lists/2011/06/press-release


我算了算,每个CPU的计算能力也不到150GFlop/s; 龙芯都有这个成绩把,哈哈!
用了68544 SPARC64 VIIIfx CPUs,这真的不计代价的堆数量堆出来的;
堆这个数量,你用Intel已经出来的或者AMD推土机的,成绩只会比这个更好。
小日本也不把报价说说,造价就是它的软肋!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

12#
发表于 2011-6-20 22:46 | 只看该作者
66666 发表于 2011-6-20 21:00
接近7万个Sparc64 VIIIfx,45nm下跟费米大小差不多,性能大约有128Gflops,日本人还真是变态花这么高的代价 ...

兄弟,还是你一眼就看出成本的问题了;

舍得花钱还怕的不了第一的? 天河只用了7千多个GPU,一个节点是2块CPU+1块GPU,一共只有7000多个1U的机箱的空间;

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

13#
发表于 2011-6-20 22:54 | 只看该作者
听说天-朝从今年开始也不用GPU搞了,为了自主创新,计划全部用龙芯搞。估计很快就会见到五位数龙芯堆出来的超算。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

14#
发表于 2011-6-20 22:56 | 只看该作者
asdfjkl 发表于 2011-6-20 22:46
兄弟,还是你一眼就看出成本的问题了;

舍得花钱还怕的不了第一的? 天河只用了7千多个GPU,一个节点是 ...

{lol:]问题是**的龙芯花再多 还是悲剧
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

15#
发表于 2011-6-20 22:58 | 只看该作者
据富士通称,该款超级计算机仍在建造之中,将于2012年11月正式投入运行,届时处理器数量将增加到8万个。
怕是现在是第一;到了2011年11月投入运行时,就不是第一了;呵呵呵,大家懂的!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

16#
发表于 2011-6-20 23:43 | 只看该作者
啥国产有什么意义

真需要我朝SNB一样出来{lol:]
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

17#
发表于 2011-6-21 03:17 | 只看该作者
日本人依旧顽固的思想,不过也挺好的...自己造舒心不是么~
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

18#
发表于 2011-6-21 08:27 | 只看该作者
山寨龙芯一出谁与争锋!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

19#
发表于 2011-6-21 08:40 | 只看该作者
没事,天河系统又可以名正言顺地申请国家拨款,重夺第一宝座,老黄又要笑眯眯地卖卡了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

20#
发表于 2011-6-21 08:44 | 只看该作者
pla16539544 发表于 2011-6-21 08:37
咦,没人说超算是堆出来的啦,果然东洋的月亮是比较圆的~如果是西洋的,估计还会更圆些~

日本这个京肯定是用“CPU堆出来”的,但是京相比天河一号有两个巨大的优势:1,京的CPU全部是日本自己的厂商富士通造的;
2,由于京没有使用GPU,那它的理论计算峰值是比较容易达到的。

PS:只要美帝不封锁,某大国由于不差钱,再堆出来N倍于现在天河一号的超级计算机根本不成问题。{:5_205:}
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

广告投放或合作|网站地图|处罚通告|

GMT+8, 2025-6-8 20:39

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 POPPUR.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表