POPPUR爱换

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

手机号码,快捷登录

搜索
查看: 1202|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Woodcrest previewed from techreport.com

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2006-5-24 15:22 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
2#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-5-24 15:28 | 只看该作者
Dual Woodcrest 3GHz VS Dual Opteron 285 2.6GHz















回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

3#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-5-24 15:30 | 只看该作者


Ah, much better than Netburst. The Woodcrest system draws a little more power than the Opteron box with PowerNow! does at idle, but once both systems are busy rendering with all four cores, the Woodcrest pulls less juice.
Perhaps more importantly, there's only a 12 W difference between a single and dual Woodcrest config at idle. That CPU just isn't drawing much power at all. Under load, the difference is 59 W—much less than the 80 W TDP of the 3GHz Woodcrest, and under the 65 W target for the lower-speed Woodcrest processors.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

头像被屏蔽
4#
发表于 2006-5-24 15:31 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-5-24 15:31 | 只看该作者
It's taken some time, but Intel finally has a strong answer to the Opteron—or nearly so. The Bensley platform provides a much-improved infrastructure for low-end and mid-range servers, with vastly more bandwidth to each CPU socket—and to main memory—than previous Xeon chipsets. When they arrive, Woodcrest-based Xeons look like they will allow Intel to recapture the performance lead in server and workstations-class CPUs. We obviously haven't tested server-class applications yet, but the performance lead we've seen from Woodcrest in nearly every test we have run bodes very well indeed. So do Woodcrest's power consumption numbers, which are a revelation compared to what we've seen from Netburst processors in recent years.
Of course, when Woodcrest-derived Xeons do arrive, they may be contending with the upcoming revision-F Opterons with DDR2 memory, lower system power consumption, and perhaps higher clock speeds, as well. Will these changes be enough to keep AMD competitive against Woodcrest? That's hard to say for sure, but it certainly doesn't look like life will be easy for AMD.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-5-24 15:39 | 只看该作者

The CPU coolers and the FB-DIMMs, all of which are helped by active cooling in this server box


Our system's FB-DIMMs packed 1GB of DDR2 533 ECC memory with 4-4-4 timings
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

7#
发表于 2006-5-24 15:48 | 只看该作者
wd很不错啊(8字)
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

头像被屏蔽
8#
发表于 2006-5-24 15:50 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

9#
发表于 2006-5-24 19:54 | 只看该作者
SiSandra 用了 iSSE4 所以才会阿么夸张
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

10#
发表于 2006-5-24 20:03 | 只看该作者
Core架构的浮点峰值比同频K8高一倍
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

11#
发表于 2006-5-24 20:05 | 只看该作者
-_-感觉一般:charles:
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

广告投放或合作|网站地图|处罚通告|

GMT+8, 2025-12-30 16:29

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 POPPUR.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表