DX9代显卡无一幸免被抛弃，下一代3dmark确认只采用DX10

Edison

3DMark Next - Part 1Apr 27, 2007
Though we aren't really ready to spill all the beans about our next generation 3DMark, I thought to share some info about it anyway.. You could call it an "insider leak" if you'd like. ;)

First of all (and this shouldn't come as a shocker to anyone) the next generation 3DMark will be Windows Vista only, and will require DX10 compliant hardware. You may ask: Why no fallback to DX9 then? Well, we already have a Vista enabled DX9 benchmark (3DMark06) and the last three 3DMarks have all been DX9; 3DMark03 has one test which requires SM2.0, 3DMark05 requires SM2.0 for all tests and 3DMark06 uppers the requirements for two tests to SM3.0. I think both we and the rest of the world are ready to step into the next generation - DX10. There's no reason to go backwards, if you know what I mean.

I haven't been following up on all articles about DX10 on the net, but it really is a great step in the right direction compared to DX9. I can't go into details here (our PC product director and our sales & marketing guys would hang me by my beloved ones if I did), but the whole environment surrounding DX10 feels like a fresh breath of air. It's clean, nice, and tidy. Something completely the opposite to my apartment..

We have been working really hard on new advanced volumetric effects for the next 3DMark. 3DMark06 has some nice volumetric rendering going on, and though we were very pleased with the results, we want to go into 6th gear in the next 3DMark. This (along with the other cool things we have in the pipeline) will bring the next 3DMark into an era of "cinematic rendering", as we like to call it. :)

Enough bean-spilling. Let's look at that screenie I promised in my previous entry; another "Blast From the Past" for your viewing pleasure.

:whistling: :thumbsup:

lcdg

Windows Vista only:wacko: :wacko:
逼迫我加内存

cexoso

偶昨天加了条内存，现在2G了。。

snakebogard

为何不说是3dmark被抛弃w00t)

Edison

原帖由 snakebogard 于 2007-4-27 23:18 发表
为何不说是3dmark被抛弃w00t)

只要没有更好的通用方案，3dmark还是会被经常性作为性能衡量的指标。

2000wcw

若干年前说DDR会被RAMBUS抛弃，结果DDR越混越好

后来又说AGP会被马上绝迹，结果到现在还有新一代AGP继续出现

谁抛弃了用户，谁就会被用户抛弃:p

cexoso

反正跑还是肯定能跑，只是会想Ti4200跑3dmark03一样，有些测试不能跑而已吧

killpmp

原帖由 snakebogard 于 2007-4-27 23:18 发表
为何不说是3dmark被抛弃w00t)

从来只有新软件抛弃落后的硬件，而不会反过来
仅支持DX9的硬件即将成为过去式

proll

楼上的，DX 10就是DDR…………

Allko

yun a. 那还要不要买7600GT呢:huh:

天之福音

原帖由 Allko 于 2007-4-28 00:12 发表
yun a. 那还要不要买7600GT呢:huh:

跑分 和买显卡 2回事情

aibo

很简单的逻辑

xp不支持dx10，所以dx10的测试软件肯定是for vista only的

天之福音

原帖由 aibo 于 2007-4-28 00:36 发表
很简单的逻辑

xp不支持dx10，所以dx10的测试软件肯定是for vista only的

万一能破解呢？

5900

各位应该高兴，终于可以脱离3DMARK的魔爪。:lol:

snakebogard

原帖由 Edison 于 2007-4-27 23:20 发表

只要没有更好的通用方案，3dmark还是会被经常性作为性能衡量的指标。

很可惜是现有的3dmark已失去公正性,很多跑分好的卡在游戏里表现一塌糊涂.dx10我更相信crysis.:blink:

binbin521

原帖由 AlcatrazX 于 2007-4-28 00:42 发表

希望不大，硬件的驱动架构在xp和vista下面是不同的，也就是说，除了有人破解，使得dx10能安装到winxp下面。
还需要有人重写驱动，我相信，这个除了nv和ati内部的人之外是没能干的。

有需要当然就有市场的~~~我估计很快就有DX10 FOR XP

troopersky

原帖由 snakebogard 于 2007-4-28 08:48 发表

很可惜是现有的3dmark已失去公正性,很多跑分好的卡在游戏里表现一塌糊涂.dx10我更相信crysis.:blink:

这个我支持，前年底看了评测买了7800gt，在有些游戏中速度也不是很快，在关键场景中还是有比较明显的停滞。结果，出了了事！

小李v飞刀

显卡买来不是用来跑MARK的
是跑游戏的

ren123y

原帖由 小李v飞刀 于 2007-4-28 10:48 发表
显卡买来不是用来跑MARK的
是跑游戏的

跑不出来分也跑不好游戏。