ibm提交的k10成绩被spec.org藐视了

bessel

http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/resu ... 20070903-01948.html

流年不利阿。

samhrc

why non-compliant ? No answers found on that web,can you explain it ?

zaarath

SPEC.ORG要求被测试系统成绩提交90天之内必须上市，否则就是non-compliant. IBM弄不到足够的K10，所以无法在90天之内满足要求。

elisha

20070903提交的，到现在还没有90天吧
而且看样子90天内应该还是能上市的
上面写的是 Hardware Avail:  Nov-2007

Prescott

原帖由 elisha 于 2007-11-10 09:34 发表
20070903提交的，到现在还没有90天吧
而且看样子90天内应该还是能上市的
上面写的是 Hardware Avail:  Nov-2007

delay了。

samhrc

看来整数成绩一般般。

the_god_of_pig

RP守恒定律-_-

Prescott

我还是第一次看见被spec蔑视的成绩。真是非同寻常。

elisha

原帖由 Prescott 于 2007-11-10 09:39 发表


delay了。

IBM都搞不到K10啊，怪不得AMD要去死了

elisha

还真的是这样啊

As if the initial Barcelona benchmarks submitted eons ago wasn't bad enough, SPEC.org appears to have labelled them as non-compliant. IBM having problems securing enough Barcelonas failed to meet the requirements of shipping systems 90 days after submitting results.

What I find really surprising is the fact that even a Tier1 vendor like IBM can't seem to get hold of AMD's latest quad-core. If an important customer can't even ship a lower bin 1.9Ghz Barcelona months after product launch one has to wonder how many has AMD really managed 请注意文明用词。 of the door. I was joking around when I said AMD most likely shipped 20,003 Barcelona's because it's the lowest end of the statement "shipped tens of thousands". With the news spreading and the gathering noise about K10's lack of availability, it appears my tongue in cheek comment may be a bit more accurate than first thought.

IBM fails to ship even the most meager four-core Opteron box - The Reg
"In the meantime, IBM has to look the sucker with NON COMPLIANT stamped all over its benchmarks."

If you're one of those that ever wondered what is the worst kind of evidence when caught doing a paper launch,... well, now you know!