POPPUR爱换

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

手机号码,快捷登录

搜索
查看: 8858|回复: 39
打印 上一主题 下一主题

目前最全的显卡功耗对照表

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
#
发表于 2008-9-23 12:17 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
无意中在某论坛发现的,转过来

First up I'd like to thank michael999 for starting the original thread HERE

Alright, below is largely what michael999 had in his thread but with updated Wattages and cards, plus any other info I can find along the way.

*** Please, if you find any info related to this thread or more accurate wattage readings for cards please post the link in here so that I can update the list. ***

Right, on with the show!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Truth About Graphics Power Requirements V2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok. There is much confusion as to how much power you actually need to run the new uber card, the answer is not as simple as first thought. It turns out many older cards use more power than the new ones. And the myth that NVIDIA suck more juice is a just that, a myth.

It seems that there are three main factors behind power consumption:



  • Core/Mem clock speeds - Higher clocks equal higher power consumption. (eg look at the difference between the 7900 GTX & GT, both the same GPU and memory but the core and memory are clocked differently, producing a 36W difference. Similar story with the X1900XT/XTX)
  • Die size/fabrication process (110nm/90nm etc) - Smaller process equals a smaller die, thus less power needed. For example look at the 7900 GTX, it's a 196 mm² die size while the X1900XTX is 352 mm², both are 90nm, and clocked almost exactly the same but the 7900 GTX draws 36W less.
  • Amount and type of onboard RAM - Greater amounts of onboard RAM capacity mean greater power consumption. Also newer GDDR draws less power GDDR > GDDR2 > GDDR3 > GDDR4. (eg look at the difference between the X1900XT & X1900XT 256MB model, same in every way except capacity and GDDR3 vs GDDR4 respectively, which results in a 10W drop)

--------------------------------------------------
GFX Card Comparison Table
--------------------------------------------------

This table shows GFX cards power consumption, not what the recommended PSU requirements are, but rather the actual draw of the card. The graphs show max 3D power draw as well as idle and max 2D power draw where possible.

All readings have been found on the web, you can find where I got the details from by looking in the "source links" legend below the graphs. I'v provided a simple legend to help you find where it came from. (eg look for an *, ², ^ etc after each reading)

The measurments displayed after each bar on the graph are displayed as min power draw - max 2d power draw - max 3d power draw. If there's only two readings it's likely just min-max 3D, and if there's just the one reading it'll be the max 3d reading.

Last thing of note. I've tried to normalise all the readings found at the various websites against cards that have been properly tested for power draw (eg what xbitlabs mostly does), not just a generic total system score. This should hopefully provide more accurate results for cards with readings that are otherwise of not much use. Where I can't find proper readings from a website I've utilised http://www.extreme.outervision.com/psucalculator.jsp where possible, they're likely to be above actual wattage needed but are still quite accurate compared to TDP ratings from vendors.
NB: Some of the links might not be the only source of info in calculating the ratings

For nice and pretty picture versions check these out (kept up to date):
Charts sorted by peak 3D - http://mark.zoomcities.com/images/gfx/GFXpowerchartby3d.png
Charts sorted by idle - http://mark.zoomcities.com/images/gfx/GFXp...chartbyidle.png


Graph Legend
' = 1 Watt
| = 2 Watts
} = 4 Watts
# = 8 Watts
¦) = 8 Watts (idle draw mark)
¦] = 8 Watts (max 2D draw mark)
? = Rating yet to be obtained. Just a placeholder for the card.
* = The official "peak power consumption" (or TDP) from the manufacturer


ATI Multicard
HD4870X2 CF__________#################¦)############################################## 149W-512W
HD4870X2 + HD4870 CF_##################¦)################################| 150W-409W (HD4870 512MB)
HD4870 CF____________###############¦)###############}|' 128W-255W
HD4870 + HD4850 CF___###########¦)###############}' 96W-221W
HD4850 CF____________#########¦)##############}|' 78W-199W
HD4670 CF____________#####¦)#######}| 44W-110W

HD3870 X2 CF_________###########¦)#######################}|' 95W-307W
HD3870X2 + HD3870 CF_##########¦)################' 82W-225W
HD3870 CF____________####¦)###############|' 40W-163W
HD3850 CF____________####¦)############|' 40W-139W

HD2900 XT CF_________#############¦)########################| 105W-306W (2x 1GB GDDR4)
HD2900 XT CF_________###############¦)#########################|' 121W-331W (2x 512MB GDDR3)

X1950 XTX CF_________####¦)#####################|' 37W-211W
X1900 XTX CF_________#####¦)#####################' 43W-217W
X1900 XT CF__________###¦)###################}' 27W-189W
X1950 Pro CF_________##¦)##########}| 24W-110W
X1900 GT CF _________################|' 123W
X1800 XT CF__________######¦)##############|' 52W-171W
X1800 XL CF__________#######¦)##########}' 62W-149W
X1650 XT CF__________###¦)########}|' 25W-101W
X1600 XT CF__________#########}| 78W
X1600 PRO CF________########' 67W
X1300 PRO CF________#######} 60W

X850 XT CF___________##############|' 115W
X800 XL CF___________##########' 81W

[ 本帖最后由 Cerellean 于 2008-9-23 12:23 编辑 ]
39#
发表于 2008-12-22 16:59 | 只看该作者
不错,收藏了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

38#
发表于 2008-12-22 16:51 | 只看该作者
LZ辛苦了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

37#
发表于 2008-12-22 16:20 | 只看该作者
半信半疑!
感觉所有都低了一些!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

36#
发表于 2008-12-22 15:22 | 只看该作者
好详细的资料,强,看来4850CF还行啊,不是很厉害
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

35#
发表于 2008-12-22 15:21 | 只看该作者
好详细的资料,强
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

34#
发表于 2008-12-22 14:49 | 只看该作者
GTS单卡100W,双卡200不到,比想象少很多,不错不错{closedeyes:]
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

33#
发表于 2008-12-22 14:22 | 只看该作者
3850真不错。高端显卡好费电啊。够用就好。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

32#
发表于 2008-12-22 14:02 | 只看该作者
HD4670 ______________#¦)####}|' 16W-55W
9600 GT______________###¦)¦]##}' 27W-34W-61W (512M
9600 GT______________###¦)###|' 26W-59W (256M

原来4670的功耗优势也不是那么明显
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

31#
发表于 2008-12-22 13:52 | 只看该作者
太假了 1950GT才50多W?那不要外接电源为啥点不亮呢?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

30#
发表于 2008-12-8 13:05 | 只看该作者
3850还不错啊
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

头像被屏蔽
29#
发表于 2008-12-8 12:58 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

28#
发表于 2008-12-8 12:36 | 只看该作者
{wink:] 图是,只计算显卡功率?
{victory:] 9800gtx+  117w满载
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

27#
发表于 2008-12-8 11:28 | 只看该作者
我记得tom有过一个功耗表啊
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

26#
发表于 2008-12-8 11:20 | 只看该作者
顶下,我觉得比较准啊
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

25#
发表于 2008-12-8 11:16 | 只看该作者
不错~~
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

24#
发表于 2008-12-8 11:14 | 只看该作者
mark{lol:]
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

23#
发表于 2008-9-26 02:28 | 只看该作者
高端的功耗都呈曲线上升的
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

头像被屏蔽
22#
发表于 2008-9-26 01:33 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

21#
发表于 2008-9-25 23:57 | 只看该作者
[huffy> 1950PRO CF才110W,不可信啊不可信
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

20#
发表于 2008-9-25 19:24 | 只看该作者
图收藏了{shy:]
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

广告投放或合作|网站地图|处罚通告|

GMT+8, 2025-10-1 02:16

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 POPPUR.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表