|
|
看市场产品必须要结合本国的实际产品才有意义。07年以后SHARP龟缩日本的状况基本已成定局，拿日本的CPVA面板+ASV来综合衡量SHARP的品质是不科学的。好多人，包括对岸的一些人士到处翻译日本人的文章，除非能从日本带回来，否则根本就没有依据。
欧美著名的AVF论坛上就对SHARP07年以后的表现就没太多好眼色，不知道中国为什么那么多人在到处传说SHARP的面板好什么的，人家对ASV的评价并不高。不过同样需要注意的是，他们的结论来自他们本国的产品线。就目前来看，欧美市场玩家主要还是在推荐VIERA的IPS ALPHA面板。
转几段我蛮喜欢的一个AVF论坛上专业的电视评测员的结论，我觉得还是比较公正的：
"Not so long ago, Sharp LCDs were the golden jewels of home electronics. Their quality was simply unbeatable and oozed opulence from every angle. Simply put, they were the Kuro of their days. But that all changed in 2007 when Sharp adopted a newer-simpler design (for the Western market). In truth, Sharp no longer invest heavily in the European and the U.S market due to the heavy competition from budget and Korean brands such as Samsung, L.G and Vizo. So if you’re after a high-quality Sharp model, you’ll have to import one directly from Japan."
That's my (prologue) quote from the review of LC-42DH77E. It's not up on the HDTVtest yet, but it'll be there sometime next week or the week after.
IMO, it's one of the worst LCDs out there. For the price, there's far better alternatives.
Sharp's implementation of MCFI is poor to average. Although it didn't produce any noticeable artefacts, the improvement was minimal.
Color accuracy was just down-right poor and there's no way of rectifying it. It also suffered from low-tone smearing. To finish it off, the speakers are just rubbish. They sounded very low and lacked definition.
If I were you, I would stay well away from Sharp (unless you wish to import one from Japan). |
|
IP卡
狗仔卡
楼主
显身卡
发表于 2009-5-10 18:57
