|
本帖最后由 mapleo 于 2010-5-2 00:07 编辑
$ g: \! p. Q5 M8 b/ m“5450就是5400的无线版本,一模一样,5400是5500的缩水版”。这不是谁说的,也不是谁猜的,这是 ...' c8 X6 v7 U! e1 }( R& r/ I
皮球 发表于 1/5/2010 11:21 PM ![]()
& _; T+ c5 r% {0 Y2 K
+ j: v$ x. T' f) O: {你真是无知的可怕,我重来没有不承认z5450和z5400的关系,不过请你拿出证明来5400和5500是同一时期发售的,5400先上市了好一段时间才出了5500,之后才出的Z5450,也就是说5450在5500之后上市,这个东西就相当于E5200出了很久才推出E6300之后又出E5400一样。关于价格我不是瞎说的,以前我查过的,是加拿大罗技官网的价格,现在已经没有了,不过我搜到有一个人发的帖子,里面说Z5450比Z5500贵的事实。另外,不是我买的东西就是好,我比较就是因为当时想换Z5500,但是比较之后就暂时不换了,以后有好的自然会换,不知道你怎么说什么心态?下面是关于价格的链接和引用:+ K% P) Y) k _7 V' G% V
8 c6 m3 h2 z C" ?
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/195511-28-logitech-5450-5500
! a _7 e$ N+ E3 g
5 d. ?8 t6 B8 fI'm almost embarrassed to post this. I would not purchase Logitech speakers at their normal price. However, I am able to get the Z-5450's from Dell for $150 or the Z-5500's for $130 through my work, if I act today. Though I'm no real fan of Logitech speakers I think they may be worth $150. ( U3 Z$ d( l* A
2 u; d/ T- m: v) DFor an apartment which would be the better choice? I know the Z-5500 are more popular and may sound better but the semi-wireless of the Z-5450's is attractive as well. There's no way I'm going to get to enjoy the bass potential of either as, again, I'm in an apartment.
6 O$ [& K$ I8 |
; {7 v3 r1 P, m& C; O! r( XShould I just skip this and not waste up to $150 or is this something I shouldn't miss? |
|