|
|
p5wdh vs d975xbx vs dq6 32M super comparison 结论
P5WDG
pro:
1. High FSB boot up. no one is going to use soft FSB set everyday.
2. easy recovery if fail to post, 2nd post will use default setting and previous bios options saved
3. CF
con:
1. High FSB over 350 can't use DDR2 1000+ option. some ram's hidding timing are not currect and result is fail to post
2. 975 MCH requires higher voltage
DQ6
pro:
1. a lot of bios options and fsb up to 600, vcore, vdimm
2. MCH for 965 is better than 975, with normal 1.2v i can boot up to 400
con:
1. memory divider has same problem with 975, with high FSB can use DDR2 1000+ option... some hideing timing is not currect
2. too many bios options are NOT working, like say 1.6v+ vcore just won't boot......
3. very bad bad bad bios design. you can't change all setting at once, you need to change one option, save, boot up ,change one option, save, boot up again and repeating until everything is done.... this is soooooo gay
4. no program available for soft ram timing adjust
5. not support 7950, CF. nor SLi
6. back plat is not good if you wanna use TQ120......
7. too many... not worse to buy one....
是我英文不好还是DQ6真的不支持7950??????可是看图分明用的7950。
[ 本帖最后由 zzq456zzq456 于 2006-7-18 19:54 编辑 ] |
|