Radeon HD 2400 and 2600 vs GeForce 8600@vista

cmd

http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2007q3/radeon-hd-2400-2600/index.x?pg=4

驱动是ForceWare 158.45 drivers 和催化剂 8.83.9.1-070613a-048912E drivers

Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 2600 Pro	Radeon HD 2600 XT	GeForce 8500 GT	GeForce 8600 GT	GeForce 8600 GTS
HD noise reduction	0	25	25	0	0	0
Video resolution loss	20	20	20	20	20	20
Jaggies	0	20	20	0	10	10
Film resolution loss	25	25	25	0	0	0
Film resolution loss - Stadium	10	10	10	0	0	0
Total score	55	100	100	20	30	30

HQV 画质测试Radeon大胜，但评测中指出大概是因为8600的未成熟驱动所致。

We could chalk up the GeForce cards' poor scores here to immature drivers. Obviously, the current drivers aren't doing the post-processing needed for noise reduction and the like. However, I received some pre-release ForceWare 162.19 drivers from Nvidia on the eve of this review's release, which they claimed could produce a perfect score of 100 in HQV, and I dutifully tried them out.

功耗和噪音：



结论：肯定了价格和HQV上的一些优势。
至于性能:(  :(

Here's the shame of it: the Radeon HD 2600 XT GPU packs about 100 million more transistors than the GeForce 8600 GTS, is a larger chip even though made on a smaller fab process, is built on a longer card with a larger cooler, and has more theoretical memory bandwidth and shader power. Yet it can't keep pace with the 8600 GT all of the time, let alone the GTS, in current games. AMD's aggressive pricing may make the 2600 XT a successful product and a reasonable choice for consumers, but it doesn't entirely erase the sense of unrealized potential.

zjycgs

LZ从火星归来吗？162.18驱动的评测已经满天飞了还发158.45？w00t)

NewCastle

162.18，已经满天飞了，这个测试连162.15都没用，还是158.45，转来干什么？ w00t)

cmd

原帖由 zjycgs 于 2007-7-11 23:04 发表
LZ从火星归来吗？162.18驱动的评测已经满天飞了还发158.45？w00t)

这个是老外7月10日的测试，算是比较新的了，用的驱动是火星点了。:sweatingbullets:

zzhang

原帖由 来不及思考 于 2007-7-11 23:10 发表
158.45 ....

既然已知有新驱动提升了性能，这样的测试还有必要转？ :unsure:

呵呵，老驱动2600xt尚且大败，更何况是新驱动。LZ这个测试还是有一定意义的。

wjyj10

我只看高清以及功耗部分的测试结果。

saintangel

重点是视频和功耗噪音测试吧
至于游戏，掰掰指头也能知道:lol: