今天没事PING 了4个路由

kamijun

TTL128:( :( :(

kupst

正在连接到 192.168.0.1, 端口 21 (#1)
已连接。正在等待响应。
220 Inactivity timer = 120 seconds. Use 'site idle <secs>' to change.
USER root
331 SpeedTouchUser 'root' OK.  Password required.
PASS xxxxxx
230 OK
SYST
215 UNIX Type: L8


阿尔卡特 的开发团队是用UNIX 系统的
其他厂商都基本是用LINUX 系统
想证实下阿尔卡特还是原来的不

731214

没错，我的新版608也是ping  -l 65500 是16MS:)
2WIRE的2700HG-B无线ADSL路由器ping  -l 65500 是19MS，好在是内存大，比608要大一倍，32M，呵呵:a)

samhrc

CISCO 2501

Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=1472  time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=1472  time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=1472  time<1ms TTL=64

CPQinxu

原帖由 kamijun 于 2007-10-10 21:53 发表

:o
Marvell Arm9 CPU 不知道频率多少，如果在200M下 这个成绩 厉害的一塌糊涂，比我PING我们单位 WIN2003服务器还要快的多啊
不过这个成绩自己PING自己的话到是正好

具体的我都不太清楚
路由在这里买的
http://store.taobao.com/shop/view_shop.htm?user_id=cca413102ccce93dd1e5da89d4efe2fb

菜鸟来啦

俺的 - l 65500 全是1MS:funk:

kamijun

原帖由 菜鸟来啦 于 2007-10-14 19:38 发表
俺的 - l 65500 全是1MS:funk:

估计路由自己旁路掉了吧，对于大于一定数的包，自动算网络攻击了吧

btlang

俺昨天买的阿卡PP500(S6307mv)成绩：
ping 192.168.1.1 -l 65500 19ms
-l 2000 6ms
感觉还可以，cpu 是BCM6338的，这款芯片和6348除了扩展性外，性能方面是没有什么差别的，看来家用的就是不如企业级的啊！

菜鸟来啦

原帖由 kamijun 于 2007-10-14 20:26 发表

估计路由自己旁路掉了吧，对于大于一定数的包，自动算网络攻击了吧

哦

大家帮忙看看


Pinging 10.0.0.8 with 65500 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.0.8: bytes=65500 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.0.0.8: bytes=65500 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.0.0.8: bytes=65500 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.0.0.8: bytes=65500 time<1ms TTL=64

Ping statistics for 10.0.0.8:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

kewell

Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 20000 bytes of data:

Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=20000 time=17ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=20000 time=17ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=20000 time=17ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=20000 time=17ms TTL=64

Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 17ms, Average = 17ms

fordash

wrtgs v1.1 版的     ping 65500是 22ms  ping20000是7ms

wylxn

wrt54g v4
20000 7ms
65000 20ms

meisajun

单口版的610，不是很强，最大36992，19MS，36993都不行，感觉上了20MS就挂了，不知道是参数设置的问题还是机器本身不支持。一般的应用还是不错的。对我来说够用了，电信送的猫，PING本地DNS在9MS左右，610少点6-7MS，不知道再换个wrt54g这类的会不会还可以再快些。
C:Documents and SettingsAdministrator>ping 10.0.0.138 -l 36993

Pinging 10.0.0.138 with 36993 bytes of data:

Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 10.0.0.138:
    Packets: Sent = 1, Received = 0, Lost = 1 (100% loss),
Control-C
^C
C:Documents and SettingsAdministrator>ping 10.0.0.138 -l 36992

Pinging 10.0.0.138 with 36992 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.0.138: bytes=36992 time=19ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.0.0.138: bytes=36992 time=19ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.0.0.138: bytes=36992 time=19ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.0.0.138: bytes=36992 time=19ms TTL=64

Ping statistics for 10.0.0.138:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 19ms, Average = 19ms

cdumm

speedtouch 716V5无线版

Pinging 10.0.0.138 with 20000 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.0.138: bytes=20000 time=5ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.0.0.138: bytes=20000 time=5ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.0.0.138: bytes=20000 time=5ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.0.0.138: bytes=20000 time=5ms TTL=64

Ping statistics for 10.0.0.138:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 5ms, Average = 5ms


Pinging 10.0.0.138 with 65500 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.0.138: bytes=65500 time=16ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.0.0.138: bytes=65500 time=16ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.0.0.138: bytes=65500 time=16ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.0.0.138: bytes=65500 time=16ms TTL=64

Ping statistics for 10.0.0.138:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 16ms

wkenet

ASUS WL-500g-x

24

joneni

能指教一下，PING -L 65500得到的事件大小，能判断出什么吗？