举例说明:什么叫枪文

CaptianGhostSSE

:unsure: :huh: :o  不知道作者是哪只，我相信人不可能无耻到这种地步。

chairmanai

日啊，这篇文章拥有超过三万当量的破坏力，intel直接被摧毁了:wacko:

myomy

这个确实强到一个地步了

NONO

AMD就是需要這樣的人材~~ :thumbsup:

yfren01

终于看到人可以无耻到何种地步了.........:p

agrantleung

文采不错，但只可以忽悠一下小白~

瓜僧

认真学习中，免得以后穷得活不下去的时候去做枪手，却被人说“装着个猪头居然说自己是猪八戒”

kisazhu

果然领先6年。。。可惜是在嘴上。。。

瞎猫

看完此文，3.2G的胶水四核已经强到没对手了挖。大感明天intel就要破产保护了。。。:w00t):
如果同样拱到3.2G，貌似K10也不会有多凉快(_(

Jason21

经典名枪！:thumbsup:

flymop

枪中名流，不愧大家风范
梅X，悍X之流还与之相差甚远啊

wodaoo

我的天啊，这是远望网站出的文章？N久不买《微机》没想到成这样了)_)

shike_cuke

ID比较有意思...........

mxyou

看来想当枪也不容易，要学习的地方还有很多啊

鹰舞龙

难道非要夸INTEL的才是王道？贬I的是枪文，那夸I的就是炮文咯。:lol:

HAYATO1

PD失败是真的，但市场占有率比同期的X2要高的多了。 扣肉反击也打的很成功 不只是一点点颜面

lacri

原帖由 鹰舞龙 于 2007-12-6 11:07 发表
难道非要夸INTEL的才是王道？贬I的是枪文，那夸I的就是炮文咯。:lol:

这不是夸谁不夸谁的问题，而是要看说的是不是实情。在目前AMD焦头烂额之际，还有脸说出这样的话，不是枪又是什么！！:funk:

4X4

行了，以后AMD所有处理器可以有新名称了，“正龙”！AMD也改名叫“周正龙”！

Edison

Anand在blog里写到他的同事也有一片9770，但是功耗表现比他们在网站上发表的那片和谐许多，他判断可能是主板的问题。

http://www.anandtech.com/weblog/showpost.aspx?i=313

November 21, 2007

Core 2 Extreme QX9770: Not so hot after all? - Anand Lal Shimpi - Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 12:00 AM

As I mentioned in our Core 2 Extreme QX9770 Preview, my chip got pretty hot. Both Gary and I had QX9770 samples that could barely run at 3.2GHz without added cooling, not to mention that both of our CPUs consumed significantly more power than the highly overclockable QX9650 we reviewed just a few weeks earlier. Here's a graph from the review, showing how my QX9770 stacked up against the QX9650: I had a meeting with Intel today to discuss the issues and they provided some insight. The chip I have should run at a 1.2875V core voltage, but as you'll see from the below CPU-Z screenshot, it did not: Now the 1.336V core voltage alone isn't enough to make up for the power difference I reported, but it was responsible for some. Why was my chip running at a higher core voltage? The BIOS was set to auto-detect the core voltage but it appears that there may be something wrong with the way the ASUS P5E3 Deluxe BIOS handles the QX9770. Gary just forwarded me a new BIOS revision that supposedly fixes the problem, but that doesn't put us in the clear just yet. Intel is going to get back to me within the next day or so with a full analysis of whether or not I have a bad chip, or if the higher core voltage alone is the only abnormality in what I saw. Even at a lower core voltage my QX9770 ended up consuming around 30W more power than the QX9650, but it's quite possible that I have a really bad QX9770 and a really good QX9650. Individual chips, even at the same frequency, can have vastly different operating voltages - which we already knew. But it's also possible to get a range of power consumption between chips at the same frequency and same voltage; meaning that it's possible to have two QX9770s with the same operating voltage, but significantly different power consumption characteristics. I always figured that voltage was the primary determinant of how two otherwise identical processors performed from a power perspective, but it turns out I was wrong. In any case, it looks like the QX9770 issues may not be nearly as big of a concern as I originally thought. At this point it looks like a BIOS problem + hotter than normal chip, but I'll let you know if Intel comes back with anything different. On a related note, it looks like Intel will eventually begin shipping its Extreme processors with a better heatsink; I should have one in the coming weeks. Now if Intel could only do something about that damned mounting system we'd be getting somewhere.