没人关注Phenom II X2 和Athlon II X2 吗？游戏性能功耗都把E6300给灭了

china17

AMD这两个双核估计要火

http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3572&p=4


The Test

Motherboard:	Intel DX58SO (Intel X58) Intel DX48BT2 (Intel X48) MSI DKA790GX Platinum (AMD 790GX) Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H (AMD 790GX) Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-UD5P (AMD 790FX)
Chipset:	Intel X48 Intel X58 AMD 790GX AMD 790FX
Chipset Drivers:	Intel 9.1.1.1012 (Intel) AMD Catalyst 8.12
Hard Disk:	Intel X25-M SSD (80GB)
Memory:	G.Skill DDR2-800 2 x 2GB (4-4-4-12) G.Skill DDR2-1066 2 x 2GB (5-5-5-15) Qimonda DDR3-1066 4 x 1GB (7-7-7-20) Corsair DDR3-1333 4 x 1GB (7-7-7-20)
Video Card:	eVGA GeForce GTX 280
Video Drivers:	NVIDIA ForceWare 180.43 (Vista64) NVIDIA ForceWare 178.24 (Vista32)
Desktop Resolution:	1920 x 1200
OS:	Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit (for SYSMark) Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit

Fallout 3 Game
PerformanceBethesda’s latest game uses an updated version of the Gamebryo engine (Oblivion). This benchmark takes place immediately outside Vault 101. The character walks away from the vault through the Springvale ruins. The benchmark is measured manually using FRAPS.

Gaming performance clearly goes to the Athlon II X2 and the Phenom II X2. Because of its high clock speed and very high core-to-cache ratio, the Phenom II X2 550 is actually faster than the Phenom II X4 940 in this test. Note that Fallout 3 isn't particularly heavily threaded so the X4's additional cores don't do much good here.

Left 4 Dead

AMD continues to hold on to the gaming performance lead.

FarCry 2
Multithreaded Game PerformanceFarCry 2 ships with the most impressive benchmark tool we’ve ever seen in a PC game. Part of this is due to the fact that Ubisoft actually tapped a number of hardware sites (AnandTech included) from around the world to aid in the planning for the benchmark.
For our purposes we ran the CPU benchmark included in the latest patch:

In the newer game engines we see the E6300 catching up to the Athlon II X2 250. The old Pentium 4 660 starves our testbed's GeForce GTX 280 for data; it's horrendously slow.

Crysis Warhead

Power Consumption

Both the Athlon II X2 and Phenom II X2 are light on the power consumption. Our Athlon II X2 sample actually drew more power under load, possibly because of its larger L2 caches which operate at full clock speed rather than at the 2.0GHz un-core clock of the Phenom II's 6MB L3. Alternatively, it could just be poor BIOS power management support for the Athlon II at this stage.

蝎红舞

0;0 要噴了...

gxiaok

继续路过.我观望.

boris_lee

pentium e63 价格要便宜些 $8x.

hali

关注~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ff0759

现在很少有不支持64位的软件了吧？  不普及是因为大部分人对64位认知不足或没需要用到
Sakray 发表于 2009-6-3 23:28

主要是64位对游戏，特别是一些老的神作支持不好，DIY市场很少用。

三条

3.1g对2.8g，赢太正常了
关键是上市价格多少，有竞争力的话，会逼intel降价或者出更高主频的E5 E6 E7
不管怎么说,amd进步是好事

shuhua_114

进步神速啊！！

kojiboku

双核....
看不上 = =
无视....

Sakray

LZ　N年前（05年初吧）似乎告诉我过XP64出来1个月后　64bit软件肯定普及了

结果到现在，似乎64bit还没普及
Fuyun 发表于 2009-6-3 18:48

现在很少有不支持64位的软件了吧？  不普及是因为大部分人对64位认知不足或没需要用到

ybs2050

刺激性标题，有意思~~

zajara

嘿嘿，还在啊，没办法啊，WINTEL联盟坚不可摧啊那时
china17 发表于 2009-6-3 20:28

intel也跟着AMD出x64好久了，64位照样没普及

bosschen

newegg价格109.99美元~这价格牛啊~原来对手不是e8而是e7~intel这价位要完败了~

china17

LZ　N年前（05年初吧）似乎告诉我过XP64出来1个月后　64bit软件肯定普及了

结果到现在，似乎64bit还没普及
Fuyun 发表于 2009-6-3 18:48

嘿嘿，还在啊，没办法啊，WINTEL联盟坚不可摧啊那时

jacktison

一个是2006年上市的玩意，一个市场还没见到，有意思吗

wl00560

不错，终于有点新意了……
AMD加油！

Fuyun

LZ　N年前（05年初吧）似乎告诉我过XP64出来1个月后　64bit软件肯定普及了

结果到现在，似乎64bit还没普及

iwannasay

功耗测试确实有问题，但是这个E6300真是出的莫名其妙