没人关注Phenom II X2 和Athlon II X2 吗？游戏性能功耗都把E6300给灭了

china17

AMD这两个双核估计要火

http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3572&p=4


The Test

Motherboard:	Intel DX58SO (Intel X58) Intel DX48BT2 (Intel X48) MSI DKA790GX Platinum (AMD 790GX) Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H (AMD 790GX) Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-UD5P (AMD 790FX)
Chipset:	Intel X48 Intel X58 AMD 790GX AMD 790FX
Chipset Drivers:	Intel 9.1.1.1012 (Intel) AMD Catalyst 8.12
Hard Disk:	Intel X25-M SSD (80GB)
Memory:	G.Skill DDR2-800 2 x 2GB (4-4-4-12) G.Skill DDR2-1066 2 x 2GB (5-5-5-15) Qimonda DDR3-1066 4 x 1GB (7-7-7-20) Corsair DDR3-1333 4 x 1GB (7-7-7-20)
Video Card:	eVGA GeForce GTX 280
Video Drivers:	NVIDIA ForceWare 180.43 (Vista64) NVIDIA ForceWare 178.24 (Vista32)
Desktop Resolution:	1920 x 1200
OS:	Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit (for SYSMark) Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit

Fallout 3 Game
PerformanceBethesda’s latest game uses an updated version of the Gamebryo engine (Oblivion). This benchmark takes place immediately outside Vault 101. The character walks away from the vault through the Springvale ruins. The benchmark is measured manually using FRAPS.

Gaming performance clearly goes to the Athlon II X2 and the Phenom II X2. Because of its high clock speed and very high core-to-cache ratio, the Phenom II X2 550 is actually faster than the Phenom II X4 940 in this test. Note that Fallout 3 isn't particularly heavily threaded so the X4's additional cores don't do much good here.

Left 4 Dead

AMD continues to hold on to the gaming performance lead.

FarCry 2
Multithreaded Game PerformanceFarCry 2 ships with the most impressive benchmark tool we’ve ever seen in a PC game. Part of this is due to the fact that Ubisoft actually tapped a number of hardware sites (AnandTech included) from around the world to aid in the planning for the benchmark.
For our purposes we ran the CPU benchmark included in the latest patch:

In the newer game engines we see the E6300 catching up to the Athlon II X2 250. The old Pentium 4 660 starves our testbed's GeForce GTX 280 for data; it's horrendously slow.

Crysis Warhead

Power Consumption

Both the Athlon II X2 and Phenom II X2 are light on the power consumption. Our Athlon II X2 sample actually drew more power under load, possibly because of its larger L2 caches which operate at full clock speed rather than at the 2.0GHz un-core clock of the Phenom II's 6MB L3. Alternatively, it could just be poor BIOS power management support for the Athlon II at this stage.

dxd110

路过。。。我不说话！！！

阿斯娜

估计又要被喷了 酸不拉机的话又要来了 先顶了

elisha

这个是Pentium E6300，不是以前的C2D E6300

china17

游戏进步真不错，俺也就用来游戏跟压片，呵呵，价格貌似比较便宜，搞个780G凑合凑合

china17

部分性能补遗





http://images.anandtech.com ...
AMD``FANS 发表于 2009-6-3 12:07

现在都压X264了吧，还要DIVX？
x264 HD Video Encoding PerformanceGraysky's x264 HD test uses the publicly available x264 codec (open source alternative to H.264) to encode a 4Mbps 720p MPEG-2 source. The focus here is on quality rather than speed, thus the benchmark uses a 2-pass encode and reports the average frame rate in each pass.

The latest version of the x264 codec fixes the problem exemplified in our first pass results, but these are still interesting to look at. Because of a number of unaligned memory loads all of Intel's pre-Nehalem Core based processors are penalized. The result is both the Athlon II and Phenom II are ahead of the E6300 here.
In the second pass of the test however, things return to "normal". The E6300 is technically in between the two new AMD dual-core chips, but all three basically perform the same. The Phenom II X3 710 adds another 40% to the processor cost and yields an extra ~20% in performance.

顺便改下标题，游戏性能，呵呵

joe1234

有进步就好！也给I一点压力！

Sakray

速龙II  2mL2  E5200 2mL2 效能差不多 大发现

4479237

关注~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

enmaai

550BE貌似不错
去看看我的am2板子有没有新的bios支持。

GZeasy.cn

A社说功耗，上帝都 笑了

dos

功耗测试不同的网站相差的比较多啊

langjian

支持INTEL和AMD降价大战。

china17

功耗测试不同的网站相差的比较多啊
dos 发表于 2009-6-3 16:44

应该是所用主板跟内存不同造成

harker

灭来灭去的有意思吗，无语

wu-ya

AMD这次貌似不错

china17

灭来灭去的有意思吗，无语
harker 发表于 2009-6-3 17:03

不搞点刺激性标题，没人看，呵呵