|
转载自http://www.cnet.com.au/dell-ultrasharp-u2410-339298064.htm
Input lag testsDue to request, we ran some input lag tests on the U2410, as well as bringing in the 2209WA and 3008WFP we had in the office. These were measured against a Samsung SyncMaster 957p CRT monitor, with the resolution being set to the native resolution of the TFT monitor being tested each time, both monitors cloned from a GeForce 8800GTX. A series of photos were taken with Virtual Stopwatch Pro running on screen, in order to determine the delay between image transmit and image display. We took ten samples from each monitor, then isolated the maximum, minimum and average lag recorded in both sRGB/standard modes and game modes.
Input lag was measured with Virtual Stopwatch Pro 3, a Samsung SyncMaster 957p CRT monitor and a Canon EOS 30D. (Credit: CBS Interactive)
| Dell UltraSharp U2410 (sRGB) | Dell UltraSharp U2410 (Game) | Dell UltraSharp 2209WA (Standard) | Dell UltraSharp 2209WA (Game) | Dell UltraSharp 3008WFP (sRGB) | Dell UltraSharp 3008WFP (Game) | Input lag max (ms) | 34 | 29 | 32 | 35 | 48 | 40 | Input lag avg (ms) | 31 | 14 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 24 | Input lag min (ms) | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 3 |
Kicking in game mode has a noticeable effect, reducing input lag considerably from the sRGB mode. The side effect though is oversaturated, wide-gamut colours, with greens and reds once again ramping up.
ConclusionOur only negative point on the screen is that once again Dell has inset the panel itself, so the image partly reflects on the bezel. You soon get used to it though, and with this screen sitting on your desk the vast array of positives soon outweigh the single negative. The only way to get better quality than the Dell UltraSharp U2410 is to spend a lot more money — if you need 24-inch, are on a budget but still need great quality images, we can wholeheartedly recommend this screen. |
|