DX compatible看起来有必要

yamhill

我认为，NV和AMD在DX上的表现已经够好了

知道不全力为DX做优化，后果是什么嘛？很简单，步3DFX后尘。这两家都不是傻子。

目前"the way”或"get in the game”仅仅是游戏厂商和显卡厂商的合作，以让显卡的性能发挥得更好而已。抱着良好的心愿来看，如果没有人从中作梗，这个事对大众来讲，是有很大的好处。

星星炎

没有人从中作梗？当厂家是傻子 钱白花的吗？

yamhill

没有人从中作梗？当厂家是傻子 钱白花的吗？
星星炎 发表于 2009-9-21 09:06

正因为有这样那样的情况，所以我加上了“如果”二字

yamhill

NV和AMD在DX上的表现真的够好了吗？
游戏商的游戏真的能有效率的实现DX的效果吗？
Bohr 发表于 2009-9-21 09:08

DX的表现好不好，看3Dmark，这东西可是DX的标杆

游戏的水平，要看游戏商的水平如何了

yamhill

"the way”或"get in the game”就像是竞相买所谓的“二手”自行车一样
为主流显卡优化本来就是游戏商的义务，现在却被"the way”或"get in the game”的出现变成了生意
Bohr 发表于 2009-9-21 09:07

注意，"the way”或"get in the game”是显卡厂商到游戏厂商那里帮助（或许帮助一词应该打个引号？）甚至替代他们对游戏进行优化

laimi80

最【请注意用词】的就是微软，两年推出一代DX,，和INTEL合着伙骗钱。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

yamhill

硬件驱动有whql，软件、硬件都有windows compatible，游戏很有必要建立DX compatible，从源头上刹住"the way”或"get in the game”之类的歪风。

理想的局面是：AMD、Intel、NVidia之流的硬件厂商老老实实的做好硬 ...
Bohr 发表于 2009-9-21 09:26

拜托

DX compatible和"the way”或"get in the game”，一点关系都没有

tomsmith123

遵守DX 规范，只能说兼容，不能说效能相等，DX API 相同API 在N A 卡的效率是不同的。选择不同的API 也能充分体现两个架构的差异。

roger243

DX不是专为游戏开发的～

Edison

http://alt.3dcenter.org/artikel/2004/10-08_english.php

3DCenter: Although nVidia supports many games with their "The Way Its Meant To Be Played" programme, some of those games run just as fast (or even faster) on competitors' hardware at better quality, too. Example: graphics quality in Far Cry clearly has been the worse for GeForceFX than its Canadian counterpart since the release of patch 1.1. If one enables similar quality, performance will drop tremendously below its direct competitor's. There are other TWIMTBP games which were released prior to GeForce 6800 which don't run as nicely on GeForceFX as on Radeon VGA. Our readers thus are uncertain about the true meaning of the TWIMTBP logo on their favorite games' boxes.

Darryl Still: Competiton is one of the things that is helping to ensure that the quality of games constantly improves. We welcome it and every time we come second in a benchmark, we work doubly hard to improve our performance next time. However it is extremely damaging to the PC gaming industry to focus solely on speed over compatibility. It would be easy for us to bypass Direct X guidelines to gain extra speed benefits, but that would also risk causing stability issues and crash bugs and we would prefer to stay within the guidelines and give our users a solid, compatible performance that runs reliably and gives them and extremely fast performance, without blue screens and constant referencing to driver updates or backdates.

We strive to give our users the best performance, and the 6800 series will offer that in almost every case, but we will not compromise reliability. That is the true meaning of "The Way Its Meant To Be Played". Performance AND reliability. No compromise.

roger243

http://alt.3dcenter.org/artikel/2004/10-08_english.php

3DCenter: Although nVidia supports many games with their "The Way Its Meant To Be Played" programme, some of those games run just as fast (or  ...
Edison 发表于 2009-9-21 11:33

04年的文章啊，不过NV自己说的东西要让非NV信服也没那么容易，而且NV的意思是他们会遵循DX的方向，但为什么他们不遵循DX10.1？

VGASOS

樓主殊不知MS跟INTEL一樣是個邪惡帝國
對於跟他們不相容的規格是極力推翻的
NV的THE WAY 根本是兩碼子的事
NV的計劃是幫助遊戲廠商更快更好的開發遊戲3D引擎
給於硬體底層的資料方便做出優化並且提供軟體支援
並不是在訂定規格吧
況且 硬體部分 不是都是遵從DX規定設計的嗎
沒有哪款遊戲是N卡能跑A卡不能跑的吧 頂多是效能差異而已
跟遊戲廠商合作我想應是未來趨勢吧
各家的3D引擎不斷推新 硬體製造公司應該要更了解他們的需求
做出更合適的硬體 而不是光遵照MS的規定吧