上网本和轻薄本市场的巨变要来了

870717

According to my table of BOINC results, the cores of the Llano sample(s) are comparable to 1.5 to 1.9 GHz Phenom II cores. I think it's more likely, that the actual clock frequency range is 1.4 to 1.8 GHz due to the changes to the core and the bigger L2. The Ontario core's integer performance is comparable to an 1.3 GHz Phenom II core, while the (single precision) floating point performance even matches that of an 1.6 GHz Phenom II core. The BOINC benchmark only measures single core performance.


Linux results @ ?? GHz:
Measured floating point speed 1,330 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 3,120 million ops/sec

Lets compare that to some Dualcore Atom @ 1.66GHz Linux results:
Measured floating point speed 492 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 1,664 million ops/sec

About 3 times as fast in FP and about 2 times as fast in Integer! (Although clockspeed is unknown)

itany

Llano又不是和Atom竞争的，而是和Sandy Bridge CULV竞争的
如果就是Phenom的性能，满地找牙是必然的

870717

对比ATOM的 明显是Ontario 的数据。 这玩意功耗听说低至1W

kinge

amd威武！！

870717

608yjl

据我对BOINC的成绩表中，亚诺样本（s）的核心可媲美1.5至1.9千兆赫的Phenom II内核。我认为它更可能的，实际的时钟频率范围为1.4至1.8千兆赫由于对核心的变化和更大的L2。安大略核心的整数性能相当于一个1.3千兆赫的Phenom II内核，而（单精度）浮点运算性能更匹配的1.6千兆赫的Phenom II的核心。 BOINC的基准的唯一措施，单核心的性能。


Linux的结果@？？吉赫：
实测浮点运算速度1330万老年退休金计划/秒
速度测量整数3,120万老年退休金计划/秒

让与此相比，一些Dualcore Atom@1.66GHz Linux的结果：
实测浮点运算速度4.92亿老年退休金计划/秒
测量整数速度1,664万老年退休金计划/秒

约3倍，在FP快约2倍快整数！ （尽管时钟速度是未知）