ATI 新版驱动可以让 58xx 系正常跑 TessMark 了

Edison

[TessMark] OpenGL 4 Tessellation Benchmark: Comparative Table

Now that Catalyst 10.8 drivers have fixed the Radeon HD 58xx tessellation bug, I can publish comparative tables for TessMark, the OpenGL 4 tessellation benchmark. The following results are valid with the 0.2.x branch of TessMark. Use these results as a quick way to rank your graphics card regarding the GPU tessellation.

This post will be regularly updated.

1 – Geeks3D Results

Testbed:
- CPU: Core i7 960 @ 3.2GHz
- RAM: 4GB DDR3 Corsair Dominator
- Motherboard: GIGABYTE X58-A UD5
- Windows 7 64-bit
- R258.96 + Cat 10.8
- PSU: Corsair AX1200
- All graphics cards have been tested with default clocks.

Tessellation: moderate

97804 (1632FPS) – GeForce GTX 480 3-way SLI (R258.96)

81631 (1364FPS) – GeForce GTX 480 2-way SLI (R258.96)

48084 (804FPS) – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (R258.96)

30512 (510FPS) – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC (R258.96)

29232 (487FPS) – MSI R5770 Hawk CrossFire (Cat 10.8)

27000 (450FPS) – ATI Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.8)

20366 (340FPS) – MSI R5770 Hawk (Cat 10.8)

5185 – Mobility Radeon HD 5470 (Cat 10.7)

Tessellation: normal

69952 (1167FPS) – GeForce GTX 480 3-way SLI (R258.96)

52648 (879FPS) – GeForce GTX 480 2-way SLI (R258.96)

29196 (487FPS) – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (R258.96)

17452 (291FPS) – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC (R258.96)

13667 (228FPS) – MSI R5770 Hawk CrossFire (Cat 10.8)

8177 (136FPS) – ATI Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.8)

7515 (125FPS) – MSI R5770 Hawk (Cat 10.8)

2349 – Mobility Radeon HD 5470 (Cat 10.7)

Tessellation: extreme

34934 (583FPS) – GeForce GTX 480 3-way SLI (R258.96)

24837 (414FPS) – GeForce GTX 480 2-way SLI (R258.96)

13008 (217FPS) – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (R258.96)

6729 (112FPS) – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC (R258.96)

4094 (68FPS) – MSI R5770 Hawk CrossFire (Cat 10.8)

2150 (36FPS) – ATI Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.8)

2114 (35FPS) – MSI R5770 Hawk (Cat 10.8)

820 – Mobility Radeon HD 5470 (Cat 10.7)

Tessellation: insane

7810 (130FPS) – GeForce GTX 480 2-way SLI (R258.96)

3963 (66FPS) – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (R258.96)

1959 (33FPS) – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC (R258.96)

1028 (18FPS) – MSI R5770 Hawk CrossFire (Cat 10.8)

551 (10FPS) – MSI R5770 Hawk (Cat 10.8)

548 (10FPS) – ATI Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.8)

234 – Mobility Radeon HD 5470 (Cat 10.7)

2 – Results from around the Web

Tessellation: normal – 1024×768 fullscreen

65391 (1091FPS) – GeForce GTX 480 2-way SLI, 0X MSAA, (GPU core=700MHz, GPU mem=1848MHz, CPU=Intel Core i7 X980 @ 3.33GHz, source)

27910 (466FPS) – GeForce GTX 470, 0X MSAA, (GPU core=655MHz, GPU mem=1125MHz, CPU=AMD Phenom II X4 940, source)

24985 (416FPS) – GeForce GTX 460, 0X MSAA, (GPU core=920MHz, GPU mem=2200MHz, CPU=Intel Core Q9650 @ 3GHz, source)

18922 (315FPS) – GeForce GTX 460, 0X MSAA, (GPU core=675MHz, GPU mem=1800MHz, CPU=Intel Core Q9650 @ 3GHz, source)

9081 (151FPS) – Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.7a), 0X MSAA, (GPU core=900MHz, GPU mem=1250MHz, CPU=Intel Core Q9550 @ 2.83GHz, source)

8679 (145FPS) – Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.7a), 8X MSAA, (GPU core=900MHz, GPU mem=1250MHz, CPU=Intel Core Q9550 @ 2.83GHz, source)

Tessellation: extreme – 1024×768 fullscreen

10786 (180FPS) – GeForce GTX 470, 0X MSAA, (GPU core=655MHz, GPU mem=1125MHz, CPU=AMD Phenom II X4 940, source)

8787 (146FPS) – GeForce GTX 460, 0X MSAA, (GPU core=920MHz, GPU mem=2200MHz, CPU=Intel Core Q9650 @ 3GHz, source)

6518 (109FPS) – GeForce GTX 460, 0X MSAA, (GPU core=675MHz, GPU mem=1800MHz, CPU=Intel Core Q9650 @ 3GHz, source)

2300 (39FPS) – Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.7a), 0X MSAA, (GPU core=900MHz, GPU mem=1250MHz, CPU=Intel Core Q9550 @ 2.83GHz, source)

Tessellation: insane – 1024×768 fullscreen

8011 (133FPS) – GeForce GTX 480 2-way SLI, 0X MSAA, (GPU core=700MHz, GPU mem=1848MHz, CPU=Intel Core i7 X980 @ 3.33GHz, source)

2475 (41FPS) – GeForce GTX 460, 0X MSAA, (GPU core=920MHz, GPU mem=2200MHz, CPU=Intel Core Q9650 @ 3GHz, source)

1821 (31FPS) – GeForce GTX 460, 0X MSAA, (GPU core=675MHz, GPU mem=1800MHz, CPU=Intel Core Q9650 @ 3GHz, source)

580 (10FPS) – Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.7a), 0X MSAA, (GPU core=900MHz, GPU mem=1250MHz, CPU=Intel Core Q9550 @ 2.83GHz, source)

Tessellation: normal – 1680×1050 fullscreen

39135 (653FPS) – GeForce GTX 460, 0X MSAA (GPU core=880MHz, GPU mem=2125MHz, CPU=Core i5 750 @ 2.67GHz, source)

34705 (579FPS) – GeForce GTX 480, 0X MSAA (GPU core=843MHz, GPU mem=1980MHz, CPU=Core i7 920 @ 2.67GHz, source)

9678 (161FPS) – Radeon HD 5850 (Cat 10.8), 0X MSAA, (GPU core=1000MHz, GPU mem=1250MHz, CPU=AMD Phenom II X6 1090T, source)

8476 (141FPS) – Radeon HD 5850 (Cat 10.8), 0X MSAA, (GPU core=900MHz, GPU mem=1200MHz, CPU=Core i5 750 @ 2.67GHz, source)

Tessellation: insane – 1680×1050 fullscreen

3595 (60FPS) – GeForce GTX 470, 4X MSAA (GPU core=780MHz, GPU mem=1750MHz, CPU=Core i5 750 @ 2.67GHz, source)

3171 (60FPS) – GeForce GTX 470, 4X MSAA (GPU core=607MHz, GPU mem=1674MHz, CPU=Core 2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz, source)

319 (6FPS) – Radeon HD 5500 Series, 0X MSAA (GPU core=550MHz, GPU mem=400MHz, CPU=Pentium Dual Core E5300 @ 2.60GHz, source)

Tessellation: extreme – 1920×1080 fullscreen

22074 (368FPS) – GeForce GTX 470, 0X MSAA, (GPU core=700MHz, GPU mem=1700MHz, CPU=Core i7 920 @ 2.67GHz, source)

915 (16FPS) – Radeon HD 5970, 8X MSAA, (GPU core=725MHz, GPU mem=1000MHz, CPU=AMD Phenom II X4 955, source)

Tessellation: insane – 1920×1080 fullscreen

5469 (91FPS) – GeForce GTX 470, 16X MSAA, (GPU core=830MHz, GPU mem=1800MHz, CPU=Core i5 750 @ 2.67GHz, source)

915 (16FPS) – Radeon HD 5970, 8X MSAA, (GPU core=725MHz, GPU mem=1000MHz, CPU=AMD Phenom II X4 955, source)

Tessellation: normal – 1920×1200 fullscreen

35637 (595FPS) – GeForce GTX 460, 0X MSAA (GPU core=880MHz, GPU mem=2125MHz, CPU=Core i5 750 @ 2.67GHz, source)

26641 (445FPS) – GeForce GTX 480, 0X MSAA (GPU core=700MHz, GPU mem=1848MHz, CPU=Core i7 960 @ 3.20GHz, source)

9507 (158FPS) – Radeon HD 5850 (Cat 10.8), 0X MSAA, (GPU core=1000MHz, GPU mem=1250MHz, CPU=AMD Phenom II X6 1090T, source)

8634 (144FPS) – Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.7a), 0X MSAA, (GPU core=900MHz, GPU mem=1250MHz, CPU=Intel Core Q9550 @ 2.83GHz, source)

7740 (129FPS) – Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.7a), 8X MSAA, (GPU core=900MHz, GPU mem=1250MHz, CPU=Intel Core Q9550 @ 2.83GHz, source)

Tessellation: insane – 1920×1200 fullscreen

7740 (129FPS) – Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.7a), 8X MSAA, (GPU core=900MHz, GPU mem=1250MHz, CPU=Intel Core Q9550 @ 2.83GHz, source)

5781 (97FPS) – GeForce GTX 480, 16X MSAA, (GPU core=860MHz, GPU mem=1999MHz, CPU=Intel Core i7 X980 @ 3.33GHz, source)

Sirlion

这一陀东西真恶心……

gz_easy

5850+cat 10.6跑TessMark默认set1/set2没有问题，此前此网站测试者仅仅提到5870+cat10.7有问题。

tompson823

看起来想脑花。。。

Q神

这一陀东西真恶心……
Sirlion 发表于 2010-8-26 21:01

    同感 太恶心了

goodayoo

NV现在唯一能炫耀一下的就是Tesselation跑分了，可惜游戏中大量使用的情况比较 少，谁叫480这么晚才出来呢？

erhang

这是运算什么？为什么NV快那么多？
5870怎么比460都慢好多？

jhj9

NV现在唯一能炫耀一下的就是Tesselation跑分了，可惜游戏中大量使用的情况比较 少，谁叫480这么晚才出来呢？ ...
goodayoo 发表于 2010-8-27 00:05

当然还有炫耀游戏性能了
460干掉5850的新游戏就挺常见的

jhj9

这是运算什么？为什么NV快那么多？
5870怎么比460都慢好多？
erhang 发表于 2010-8-27 00:48

A卡5系DX11废材的证据啊

namucuo

晕 这是什么比较啊

SupperSix

唉，可怜的rv870【请注意文明用词】一般的dx11性能啊，算了

goldman948

NV现在唯一能炫耀一下的就是Tesselation跑分了，可惜游戏中大量使用的情况比较 少，谁叫480这么晚才出来呢？ ...
goodayoo 发表于 2010-8-27 00:05

amd现在唯一能炫耀的就是真dx9卡无敌的dx9性能,可惜现在是win7+dx11的时代,谁叫
5870这么晚才出来呢?

goodayoo

当然还有炫耀游戏性能了
460干掉5850的新游戏就挺常见的
jhj9 发表于 2010-8-27 01:00

    嗯，也是，所以HD6870也快要出来了，460到时应该有压力了。

goodayoo

amd现在唯一能炫耀的就是真dx9卡无敌的dx9性能,可惜现在是win7+dx11的时代,谁叫
5870这么晚才出来呢?
goldman948 发表于 2010-8-27 09:11

    但至少5870让人提前一年享受DX11啊，如果等480，那人会急死。

我酷故我在

但至少5870让人提前一年享受DX11啊，如果等480，那人会急死。
goodayoo 发表于 2010-8-27 22:01

5870什么时候变成提前一年了？
1年前的现在，5870都还没出世，GTX480出来都5个月了

goodayoo

5870什么时候变成提前一年了？
1年前的现在，5870都还没出世，GTX480出来都5个月了
我酷故我在 发表于 2010-8-27 22:06

    但480是比5870晚了大半年才出来的吧，有了先出来的作对手，制造一个性能更好的产品，没有什么难度。

我酷故我在

但480是比5870晚了大半年才出来的吧，有了先出来的作对手，制造一个性能更好的产品，没有什么难度 ...
goodayoo 发表于 2010-8-27 23:21

480晚了半年到了你嘴里就变成1年，另外这和你的原话有什么关系，你的原话可是提前一年的谬论

jhj9

但480是比5870晚了大半年才出来的吧，有了先出来的作对手，制造一个性能更好的产品，没有什么难度 ...
goodayoo 发表于 2010-8-27 23:21

2900XT听到你这话，泪流满面
晚出半年，被8800GTX随便灭

HD3870听到你这话，更是痛不欲生
晚出一年多，还是被8800GTX随便灭

为啥AMD图形部门晚了一年多制造出的东西，都表示要比对手性能更好很有难度呢？