双核还是四核？来看答案

itany

The Million Dollar Question: Dual or Quad Core for the Same Price?Before talk of Intel's July 22nd price cuts surfaced, we were hardly ever asked the question "dual or quad", simply because the price differential was so great. After next week everything changes, as you'll be able to pick up a quad-core Q6600 (2.4GHz) for a measly $266. At the same time, you could get a much higher clocked dual-core E6850 (3.0GHz) for the exact same price - so which do you pick?

This graph is a lot more colorful than our previous ones because the decision just isn't that clear. If you look at the average, quad-core gains an advantage over dual-core over all of our benchmarks, but if you look at the tests themselves you'll see some trends. Encoding and 3D manipulation benchmarks have the quad-core CPU clearly ahead, while general usage and gaming benchmarks mostly favor the higher clocked dual-core E6850. So, which do you choose?
If you're strictly building a gaming box, you'll get more performance out of the dual-core E6850. However, if you do any encoding or 3D rendering at all, the quad-core Q6600 is a better buy. Our pick is the Q6600 and if you want to make up the performance difference you can always overclock to E6850 speeds, but the chip only makes sense if you're running apps that can take advantage of four cores. As the chart above illustrates, those applications are almost exclusively limited to video encoding and 3D rendering.

lzy24

从硅片面积考虑，自然是Q6600划算得多:p

另外$266的E6850似乎和$183的E6750差价过大了。。。:huh:

itany

原帖由 lzy24 于 2007-7-16 23:14 发表
从硅片面积考虑，自然是Q6600划算得多:p

另外$266的E6850似乎和$183的E6750差价过大了。。。:huh:

最高端的东西和次高端的东西的差价不能用线性推出的

Cameraman

PD的时候就有这个问题
两个620的价格是比一个820贵得多
不知道是631卖得多，还是915卖得多

ddszz

好像四核的比较有面子:p :p

mbins

4核功耗太大了。。低端4核和高端双核到底那个比较划算呢。。。:wacko:

lzy24

原帖由 itany 于 2007-7-17 00:15 发表


最高端的东西和次高端的东西的差价不能用线性推出的

你认为E6850是最高端的？w00t)

那QX干嘛去？(_(

类比。。。

E6320 $163  E6420 $183  E6600 $224

E6550 $163  E6750 $183  E6850 $266

倍频分别依次为7、8、9

shike_cuke

肯定是Q66...............