|
Benchmarks PCmark20053 h5 S+ b+ @2 V4 t3 n
6 p2 ^, h/ a! H5 T9 s1 J* ]
7 w, S" `. y l' T; A- O" fPCmark2005 tests a number of important items in today's computing world. File Compression, Encryption, Decryption, Audio Conversion, Web Page Rendering, WMV Video Compression, DivX Video Compression, Physics Calculation and 3D, Graphics Memory etc. 1 m0 S4 b' H( ~+ ]* W
As we have mentioned in the previous page, the CPU CLK might have an impact on the performance of a board. In this test, we see that the performance of the 4 boards. & U S1 V3 a7 Z5 Z/ y
From the results it can be seen that running CrossFire did not improve the PCMark05 results. Running with a single 2600XT graphics card, the score between the two is around 100 points.
8 l8 u& C* b# h3 BBenchmarks - 3Dmark2005/3DMark2006' U$ z/ R% y# Z' e4 `4 d
% M! P1 r" \4 ~' Z% J8 w5 q l2 @* u, @/ S
The board is paired up with an external ASUS 2600XT + Catalyst 7.7 driver. With a single 2600XT, the ASUS Blitz scored 9540 versus 9533 on the abit IP35 Pro. In CrossFire mode, the score soar to 14442 on the ASUS Blitz and 14176 on the IP35 Pro.
! x5 u- w& U8 t% pThe 300 point difference would be attributed to the Dual PCIe x8 interfaces (thanks to IDT PCIe switch chip) versus the Dual 4x on the IP35 Pro. it registers a 1.8% jump in performance over traditional P35's 4x+4x CrossFire solution.
" I; c3 S4 {: @& hThe same can be said with 3Dmark06. With CrossFire enabled, the score of ASUS Blitz is 8708, way higher than the Ip35 Pro running in Dual 4x PCIe. With just one card, the difference is only 7 points.- t5 B9 @8 |$ _) r. a0 Q
|
|