在打得5000+满地找牙之后，Phenom 9900遭遇了C2Q 6600……

itany

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/amd-phenom_8.html#sect0

AMD Platform:

• CPUs:
  • Phenom 9900 (Socket AM2+, 2.6GHz, 2MB L2, 2MB L3, Agena);
  • Phenom 9700 (Socket AM2+, 2.4GHz, 2MB L2, 2MB L3, Agena);
  • Phenom 9600 (Socket AM2+, 2.3GHz, 2MB L2, 2MB L3, Agena);
  • Phenom 9500 (Socket AM2+, 2.2GHz, 2MB L2, 2MB L3, Agena);
  • Athlon 64 X2 6400+ (Socket AM2, 3.2GHz, 2MB L2, Windsor).
• Mainboard: ASUS M3A32-MVP Deluxe (Socket AM2+, AMD 790FX).
• Memory: 2GB DDR2-1066 with 4-5-5-15 timings (Corsair Dominator TWIN2X2048-8888C4DF).
• Graphics card: OCZ GeForce 8800GTX (PCI-E x16).
• HDD: Western Digital WD1500AHFD (SATA150).
• OS: Microsoft Windows Vista x86.

Intel Platform:

• CPUs:
  • Core 2 Quad Q9450 (LGA775, 2.66GHz, 1333MHz FSB, 12MB L2, Yorkfield);
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (LGA775, 2.66GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 8MB L2, Kentsfield);
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 (LGA775, 2.4GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 8MB L2, Kentsfield);
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (LGA775, 3.0GHz, 1333MHz FSB, 4MB L2, Conroe).
• Mainboard: ASUS P5E3 Deluxe (LGA775, Intel X38, DDR3 SDRAM).
• Memory: 2GB DDR3-1333 with 7-7-7-20 timings (Cell Shock CS3222580).
• Graphics card: OCZ GeForce 8800GTX (PCI-E x16).
• HDD: Western Digital WD1500AHFD (SATA150).
• OS: Microsoft Windows Vista x86.

itany

逍遥散仙

没劲整天发这些贴都看腻了:funk:

itany

itany

itany

itany

itany

ITANIUM2

唉, 怒其不争啊

柯德唐志

垃圾公司可就只能出垃圾产品.

三毛妮

果真是一代神U，真四核全宇宙最强！！！

wzdenver

:funk: :funk: 看晕了

OCFish

AMD的问题不是构架。K10对比CORE并不差。关键还是工艺出了问题。

wxm

只有h.264编码胜了 是编码器的原因?
怀疑k10单路性能到底有没有比k8进步...

neeze

原帖由 OCFish 于 2007-12-25 14:00 发表
AMD的问题不是构架。K10对比CORE并不差。关键还是工艺出了问题。

:funk: :funk:
请问cpu属于何种行业?
连最最最基础的半导体技术都出毛病.还谈架构设计..
这不是纸面设计是甚么

就好比"老子能设计出600层高的大楼..但是盖不起来"一样么

[ 本帖最后由 neeze 于 2007-12-25 14:12 编辑 ]

蒙大拿

:funk: 我能设计出超光速飞船,可惜找不到能承受该速度的材料.

lzy24

7. I'm not disappointed by AMD. People forget that Intel took over three years to develop a decent answer to AMDs Hammers. AMD, on the other hand, has produced the Phenom in just a little over a year, on a much smaller budget. They're working very hard to integrate the CPU and GPU. They are famous for giving the most bang for the buck. One look at the recent $199 Phenom specials should be enough to convince anyone of that fact.

So, people who berate AMD for being "late" are simply not getting the big picture.

AMD does not need to have a faster processer, or even one of equal speed.. All they need is performance that is reasonably close to Intel's, and that can comfortably handle the most demanding games. Millions of computer buffs would prefer to purchase cpus from AMD, the spunky underdog, rather than Intel, the monolithic Goliath. It's human nature.

[Posted by: vext | Date: 12/20/07]

Reply

似乎英美人民中Afan的理论刚刚到“性能过剩论”，而中华人民共和国人民中Afan的理论体系已经很完备了:a)

wallacelu

K10挺让人失望的，A社还是猛攻中低端，造福大家吧
起码都默认的状态下，尽管我自己用C2D，但还是得承认AMD的中低端是很有性价比的

Asuka

原帖由 wxm 于 2007-12-25 14:03 发表
只有h.264编码胜了 是编码器的原因?
怀疑k10单路性能到底有没有比k8进步...

H.264吃内存性能

同频C2Q，1066fsb和1600fsb可以差30%

Asuka

原帖由 OCFish 于 2007-12-25 14:00 发表
AMD的问题不是构架。K10对比CORE并不差。关键还是工艺出了问题。

同频输得一塌糊涂，连高频都有很多情况打不过低频C2Q，也好意思大言不惭“架构没问题” o:)