看了很多新卡的分数，感觉G80 320还能凑合用

lokimawen

感觉不比8800GS 和9600差太多，等待nv下一代啦

ch1983912

3.5G的2140:shifty: LZ显卡超了吗？

lokimawen

显卡 580 1566 2000

86027456

恩自己心里能过的去就行了

frankexem

没想到2140这么超 依然是瓶颈

320显存实在太少了 其它本来就不弱

笨来笨去

G80 320 在开AA的情况下依靠320的位宽快过8800GS 和9600不少，都不开的情况下因为频率低会稍差一点。不过现在除了孤岛无法开AA，很少游戏会不开的吧。

frankexem

320MB开AA根本不够用 640MB其实可以发扬光大

笨来笨去

http://en.*********.com/2008/04/ ... ds-round-up/?page=1

Yes GeForce 8800GTS 320MB have a bigger memory interface, but because its low frequency, so the bandwidth is only few GB/s higher than 9600GT. But because of the memory size and the amount of SP, 8800GTS 320MB is a bit better than 9600GT. If the AA/AF setting raises, the gap widens (except WIC). filtering the data lower than 25FPS, 8800GTS 320MB only leads 9600GT 256MB about 4.7%.

8800GS 384MB have the same amount of SP with 8800GTS 320MB, but the memory interface is quite low. Thanks to the high clock and the bigger memory, it performs similar to 8800GTS 320MB, After filtering data lower than 25FPS,8800GT 320MB is 0.7% lower than 8800GS 384MB.

After our filtering, 8800GTS 640MB is only 0.6% less than 9600GT 512MB, leads 8800GS 768MB about 3.7%.

In performance, 8800GTS 640MB equal to 9600GT 512MB. Because of the power consumption and video decoding ability, a brand new 8800GTS 640MB should cost you the price of 9600GT 512MB minus ten bucks.



Basically
G80GTS 640=9600gt 512
8800gs>9600gt raw performance
9600gt>8800gs with AA
8800gs>G80GTS raw performance
G80GTS>8800gs with AA
8800gtx=G92GTS
8800ultra the king of single GPU video card.

笨来笨去

三块卡其实是一个档次~各有胜负~G80就吃亏在频率低~

i要频率能上到9600的650……

[ 本帖最后由 笨来笨去 于 2008-4-4 22:11 编辑 ]

Katmai

看来这一年多NV在吃老本

xzyzy

2140玩游戏还是不行的，跑06看不出。

pacificwater

原帖由 lokimawen 于 2008-4-4 18:57 发表
感觉不比8800GS 和9600差太多，等待nv下一代啦

你家里显卡性能怎么样？NVIDIA新老显卡对比

http://9sun.gz.blog.163.com/blog/static/2907999620083494559949

颓废无罪

刚在看LS前辈发的文章，还真长啊:loveliness:

xiaolongzi

很好的测试 谢谢

M2003

SM3.0超过5000分。不知道您是怎么超法~

需要更详细的资料上来佐证一下。也好给我们学习学习

[ 本帖最后由 M2003 于 2008-4-7 09:37 编辑 ]