VIA正式发布Isaiah架构处理器：VIA Nano

Edison

还是得真正跑过才知道性能如何，光看VIA那位数不多的几个自吹自擂的测试意思不大。

fasmot

应该比老赛扬强撒:loveliness:VIA的复苏，加油

Prescott

31/17 = 1.823
所以Nano比C-M 520跑OfficeBench2007稍强一点点？

elisha

同楼上，Perf呢？

ak2000

不错支持via

samhrc

我觉得用在工业控制上更合适。那些老K6、K6改、K6阉 、K6 DSP、VIA C3 、C3改、全美达、全美达改、superH、Moto 68K 、68K改、都太老太累了，该换班了。

lzy24

如果比C7强1倍多的话，还可以了

4#的图的Watt按TDP算的？？:funk:

等第3方测试

wuchiyanbin

不如atom。

elisha

原帖由 samhrc 于 2008-5-29 22:27 发表
我觉得用在工业控制上更合适。那些老K6、K6改、K6阉 、K6 DSP、VIA C3 、C3改、全美达、全美达改、superH、Moto 68K 、68K改、都太老太累了，该换班了。

这个是用在主流pc上的:funk:

elisha

很有意思的评论

[Collapse Comment]  RE: good news
By Oregonian2 on 5/29/08, Rating: 2
By Oregonian2 on 5/29/2008 3:17:09 PM , Rating: 2
Ones who have been around for a few years know VIA very well. They were the ones who made very popular (back then) motherboard chipsets that had more bugs than one could possibly imagine (at least their AMD chipsets). Once nVidia made board chipsets, VIA was toast.


Parent

[Collapse Comment] RE: good news
By Mr Perfect on 5/29/08, Rating: 2
By Mr Perfect on 5/29/2008 8:44:02 PM , Rating: 2
Do you think we'll have to wait for the "A" version of the Nano before it works correctly? :D


Parent

readium

听说Super Pi 60多秒。1.2G的。

samhrc

原帖由 elisha 于 2008-5-29 23:46 发表
这个是用在主流pc上的:funk:

用在主流PC上竞争对手多， 还有人骂。

专业领域结合应用利润少但是竞争更少，也没人骂。

elisha

原帖由 samhrc 于 2008-5-30 13:25 发表


用在主流PC上竞争对手多， 还有人骂。

专业领域结合应用利润少但是竞争更少，也没人骂。

这东西的实力跟K8有的一搏，为什么不上桌面啊