[转帖]Apple开始爆发了？NV在同一个地方摔倒两次+Inq预言

lqf3dnow

Some New 17" MacBook Pros Plagued With Failing Graphics
            March 6, 2009 9:39 AM

Apple's pricey latest luxury offerings are showcasing poor graphical integrity

                        For only $2,799 you can buy yourself an entry level new 17" MacBook Pro.  And according, to recent reports, your purchase may come with a complementary side of failing graphics.

The pricey new luxury MacBook, which debuted in January at Macworld, features both 9600M and 9400M NVIDIA mobile graphics cards. While Apple clearly thought this to be a clever design, offering bothperformance and power savings, by switching the 9600M on only ingraphically intense situations, it appears to also be making thesystems' graphics fail according to Engadget.

Numerous owners are reporting failing graphics, random green lines andartifacts on their displays.  Monitoring the graphics cards, theseusers believe that they have traced the problem back to when the secondcard -- the 9600M -- turns on.

If the second card is indeed to blame, it’s still unclear who's atfault for the fiasco.  NVIDIA last year was plagued with graphicsproblems, declaring nearly all its mobile GPUs to be defective and prone to overheating.  Apple also has not been without notable quality concerns of late.

Regardless of who's to blame though, the situation makes for some veryunhappy MacBook Pro owners.  One can only hope the purchasers are ableto warranty out their defective machines or at least hope for afirmware/driver update to solve the issues.

       
17" MacBook Pro

       

A picture taken of the artifacting occuring on one of the failing 17" MacBook Pro.  It is unclear whether NVIDIA or Apple is to blame for the failure of the $2,799 laptop's graphics.

我觉得相对G84m，G86m的集中爆发，9600M离大规模上市还有段时间，相信以后会更精彩

附inq预言
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/921/1049921/inquirer-confirms-apple-macbook-pros-have-nvidia-bad-bump-material

NewCastle

拿个例当普遍，inq加油

celajohn

眼花缭乱。。

lqf3dnow

拿个例当普遍，inq加油
NewCastle 发表于 2009-3-9 15:15

如果是个例那倒不如报导MAC爆炸的事{happy:]

MAGICWIN

没事，NV再拿出20亿美刀+送50%的备用芯片摆平，市场份额不降反升

goldman948

nb应该都用ati chip,因为ati chip绝对没有不良品和rma
也不能怪apple的工程师为了美观牺牲散热
inq和lz加油

rvchin

看不懂啊！！！！！！！！！

jhg1159

应该对本本GPU采用一种保护方法。过热就自动重置

jocover

我的8600GT也挂了

Demonhunter

朋友HP的机器点不亮了，拆开看了下果然是NV的~~~~~~

貌似移动86都一年挂的多？还好我的NVS140没事情

boris_lee

在GC 2007上，AMD又一次展示了K10 Barcelona Opteron处理器，但依然拒绝给出任何性能成绩，并且不允许现场跑分。尽管如此，INQ还是设法进行了一番测试，得到了K10的一些表现。　　AMD之所以不肯放出成绩，原因很简单，一则可能是根本拿不出手，一旦公布Intel就可以开庆祝会了，其二可能是K10对付现在的Core Conroe/Kentsfield没有问题，但却无法胜出真正的对手Penryn Wofldale/Yorkfield。
　　INQ的测试使用了AMD尚未发布的下一代高端主板RD790，搭配两块Radeon HD 2900XT显卡，频率设定为830/900MHz，驱动为催化剂7.7，另外还使用海盗船Dominator PC2-9136C5D4GB内存、西数Raptor硬盘、OCZ PP&C Quaddie CrossFire电源、Windows VistaUltimate 32-bit操作系统。当然，由于众所周知的原因，实际内存只有3.24GB。
当Agena FX Phenom FX运行在2.5GHz的时候，3DMark06得分23768，而在超频到3.0GHz的时候，得分突破了30000大关，达30031。这样的成绩着实出色，而Intel下一代Penryn的性能提升幅度平均不超过10%，看来Intel要抓紧了，Nehalem需要尽快登场。 内存方面，Phenom FX配合双通道DDR2-800在EVEREST 4.0里的理论带宽达到了12.8GB/s。相比之下，Kentsfield 2.93GHz大约在7.5GB/s，Athlon 64 X2 5000+约为8.3-8.8GB/s，即使Intel平台换成DDR3系统、频率达到1066MHz，带宽也不过11GB/s。

天涯浪子

没事，NV再拿出20亿美刀+送50%的备用芯片摆平，市场份额不降反升
MAGICWIN 发表于 2009-3-9 16:27

确实，nv的是钱，哈哈

恶咪猫

在GC 2007上，AMD又一次展示了K10 Barcelona Opteron处理器，但依然拒绝给出任何性能成绩，并且不允许现场跑分。尽管如此，INQ还是设法进行了一番测试，得到了K10的一些表现。　　AMD之所以不肯放出成绩，原因很简单 ...
boris_lee 发表于 2009-3-9 18:01

冷不防被雷了下

怎么突然变CPU了{sweat:]

ttkfy

nv这下又要花十几个亿摆平了。。。。