|
|
还是从废柴16/44开始吧
$ l4 G+ {8 F0 _9 a7 yALC888:, R4 L% }' H& q) S2 S( y# @4 O( M7 c
Summary| Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB | +0.06, -0.40 | Good | | Noise level, dB (A) | -91.4 | Very good | | Dynamic range, dB (A) | 91.2 | Very good | | THD, % | 0.0043 | Very good | | THD + Noise, dB (A) | -79.8 | Average | | IMD + Noise, % | 0.014 | Very good | | Stereo crosstalk, dB | -90.4 | Excellent | | IMD at 10 kHz, % | 0.110 | Average | | General performance | ! T( g6 ?; q3 m$ f( Q
| Very good |
7 Z; A2 x1 N+ k是不是很糟糕?IMD表现非常弱,就像当初那个解释创新src问题的文章里描述的一样
$ S7 f8 }: x% |2 B$ K+ T事实证明,HDAUDIO依旧无法绕过传统的SRC问题,16/44注定是垃圾表现
# e+ D! Q; e6 P1 T# l* T虽然其他指标已经超过了很多声卡的水平
" I5 W" @& P6 Z6 W J8 x6 v6 {+ y! R4 R4 W, [+ P3 E. |& W" [ G; {
找个竞争对手,谁呢?就se200的7.1输出吧
7 M) \0 H8 b _1 { d7 }Summary| Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB | +0.02, -0.25 | Very good | | Noise level, dB (A) | -92.0 | Very good | | Dynamic range, dB (A) | 92.0 | Very good | | THD, % | 0.0016 | Excellent | | THD + Noise, dB (A) | -85.4 | Good | | IMD + Noise, % | 0.0074 | Excellent | | Stereo crosstalk, dB | -89.1 | Excellent | | IMD at 10 kHz, % | 0.0075 | Excellent | | General performance |
9 r" V1 a5 I3 t6 U( T# j | Excellent | IMD的差距足以致命8 Z! y( l+ C4 {. B# f$ P
8 x# |" X' T$ W( [那么,16/48如何呢?se200的16/48和16/44差不多的
2 F5 z/ o+ E) A" S2 n. U不过hdaudio么:
4 } v1 `" ?$ R- D* G r3 VSummary| Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB | +0.04, -0.21 | Very good | | Noise level, dB (A) | -91.8 | Very good | | Dynamic range, dB (A) | 91.7 | Very good | | THD, % | 0.0012 | Excellent | | THD + Noise, dB (A) | -84.1 | Good | | IMD + Noise, % | 0.0080 | Excellent | | Stereo crosstalk, dB | -90.1 | Excellent | | IMD at 10 kHz, % | 0.0075 | Excellent | | General performance | 3 i: @9 g; f5 f
| Excellent |
8 H$ \ c8 t; d* ^注意IMD,已经达到se200 7.1的水平了!
8 R$ e# p2 S |6 Y其他数据也不弱!2 _" l8 M) Y* j) c
% w }) ?* p0 e% P/ D+ x3 ]/ a
不过么,16bit下的测试向来被我无视的:shifty: |
|