|
还是从废柴16/44开始吧
) p# k1 ?0 T. J! [( ]* h. Z* lALC888:# B: P3 S+ Q2 R3 t6 ~
SummaryFrequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB | +0.06, -0.40 | Good | Noise level, dB (A) | -91.4 | Very good | Dynamic range, dB (A) | 91.2 | Very good | THD, % | 0.0043 | Very good | THD + Noise, dB (A) | -79.8 | Average | IMD + Noise, % | 0.014 | Very good | Stereo crosstalk, dB | -90.4 | Excellent | IMD at 10 kHz, % | 0.110 | Average | General performance |
6 Z+ G5 |4 c% o4 {; [3 Z% a | Very good |
# N5 K" ]9 K0 r" J是不是很糟糕?IMD表现非常弱,就像当初那个解释创新src问题的文章里描述的一样
4 R& B1 G4 t7 R& ]7 \7 h事实证明,HDAUDIO依旧无法绕过传统的SRC问题,16/44注定是垃圾表现
$ x! A7 q+ f! p# ]5 J虽然其他指标已经超过了很多声卡的水平
8 Y& B0 b' v3 b& s1 b, T3 i2 f( T) v& u, i
找个竞争对手,谁呢?就se200的7.1输出吧
$ C" }- f* ], P2 b$ n4 OSummaryFrequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB | +0.02, -0.25 | Very good | Noise level, dB (A) | -92.0 | Very good | Dynamic range, dB (A) | 92.0 | Very good | THD, % | 0.0016 | Excellent | THD + Noise, dB (A) | -85.4 | Good | IMD + Noise, % | 0.0074 | Excellent | Stereo crosstalk, dB | -89.1 | Excellent | IMD at 10 kHz, % | 0.0075 | Excellent | General performance |
2 k% o% B$ p$ u( c7 J, i$ o$ T | Excellent | IMD的差距足以致命5 ^# N7 `0 D+ O5 i- i
" k: m" B4 |' } o% l
那么,16/48如何呢?se200的16/48和16/44差不多的
! }) {9 q- R f( a不过hdaudio么:- A- K$ n( k- e3 d9 b
SummaryFrequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB | +0.04, -0.21 | Very good | Noise level, dB (A) | -91.8 | Very good | Dynamic range, dB (A) | 91.7 | Very good | THD, % | 0.0012 | Excellent | THD + Noise, dB (A) | -84.1 | Good | IMD + Noise, % | 0.0080 | Excellent | Stereo crosstalk, dB | -90.1 | Excellent | IMD at 10 kHz, % | 0.0075 | Excellent | General performance |
$ x- y$ N/ H8 U) x, D5 d | Excellent | ( m; |- U6 K) t$ T) z
注意IMD,已经达到se200 7.1的水平了!
/ P' |3 x; Y: g" c" H其他数据也不弱!! v3 Q2 S# p+ x/ m/ B M2 F
# j# ]0 S. |" `# Y9 t# t6 W2 A+ n& _
不过么,16bit下的测试向来被我无视的:shifty: |
|