|
还是从废柴16/44开始吧1 X+ `4 ?6 d* i
ALC888:
" q* |6 X, O- q% k3 ^% DSummaryFrequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB | +0.06, -0.40 | Good | Noise level, dB (A) | -91.4 | Very good | Dynamic range, dB (A) | 91.2 | Very good | THD, % | 0.0043 | Very good | THD + Noise, dB (A) | -79.8 | Average | IMD + Noise, % | 0.014 | Very good | Stereo crosstalk, dB | -90.4 | Excellent | IMD at 10 kHz, % | 0.110 | Average | General performance | . v6 l* j; X y* w% Y6 P! ^9 |
| Very good | ( s9 o1 F2 z' _: z2 T/ d5 d2 @
是不是很糟糕?IMD表现非常弱,就像当初那个解释创新src问题的文章里描述的一样% C* J8 G) t: \$ ^
事实证明,HDAUDIO依旧无法绕过传统的SRC问题,16/44注定是垃圾表现 Y" ?8 t# G+ _7 n& }# o4 }8 V4 H
虽然其他指标已经超过了很多声卡的水平
8 B- t6 G6 }) `2 k g( |6 S y1 _" b- f% F3 e4 v f, J! A
找个竞争对手,谁呢?就se200的7.1输出吧
4 \, n* M/ ~7 I6 q" ~, B! \SummaryFrequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB | +0.02, -0.25 | Very good | Noise level, dB (A) | -92.0 | Very good | Dynamic range, dB (A) | 92.0 | Very good | THD, % | 0.0016 | Excellent | THD + Noise, dB (A) | -85.4 | Good | IMD + Noise, % | 0.0074 | Excellent | Stereo crosstalk, dB | -89.1 | Excellent | IMD at 10 kHz, % | 0.0075 | Excellent | General performance | % X2 c/ ?: ~- t w' G
| Excellent | IMD的差距足以致命
; l1 b6 V5 u0 v) I* L) j' W0 d Q) L) s" y( z: Q" P& T8 }( k
那么,16/48如何呢?se200的16/48和16/44差不多的) }7 a" U" a: Q$ z0 x9 V
不过hdaudio么:
- q! } D& y! \7 N* n1 {SummaryFrequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB | +0.04, -0.21 | Very good | Noise level, dB (A) | -91.8 | Very good | Dynamic range, dB (A) | 91.7 | Very good | THD, % | 0.0012 | Excellent | THD + Noise, dB (A) | -84.1 | Good | IMD + Noise, % | 0.0080 | Excellent | Stereo crosstalk, dB | -90.1 | Excellent | IMD at 10 kHz, % | 0.0075 | Excellent | General performance | , m+ k# f0 l1 B3 ~
| Excellent | 0 U6 N0 O6 p3 K/ Y2 T- V" `/ p' I
注意IMD,已经达到se200 7.1的水平了!
) F( a, c; m; {& P; H4 @其他数据也不弱!! [6 `- a' G; O# m! m+ z
( C7 D1 |: W; `0 Q
不过么,16bit下的测试向来被我无视的:shifty: |
|