|
还是从废柴16/44开始吧- {) U* z* c7 w0 T6 h/ w o/ g
ALC888:1 h' a- b+ d; G" a1 i2 O5 [" @
SummaryFrequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB | +0.06, -0.40 | Good | Noise level, dB (A) | -91.4 | Very good | Dynamic range, dB (A) | 91.2 | Very good | THD, % | 0.0043 | Very good | THD + Noise, dB (A) | -79.8 | Average | IMD + Noise, % | 0.014 | Very good | Stereo crosstalk, dB | -90.4 | Excellent | IMD at 10 kHz, % | 0.110 | Average | General performance |
8 ^. M! j1 Y( B( x2 n+ ^: j | Very good |
& `9 R) j4 ^9 Z2 r9 P2 a是不是很糟糕?IMD表现非常弱,就像当初那个解释创新src问题的文章里描述的一样
/ R% @8 |) h, g0 \事实证明,HDAUDIO依旧无法绕过传统的SRC问题,16/44注定是垃圾表现4 J" L) K) X" }7 ~
虽然其他指标已经超过了很多声卡的水平 {/ Q- \$ `& _7 @6 ]* i7 T
" O# L+ `7 U$ D7 }找个竞争对手,谁呢?就se200的7.1输出吧
$ l6 S$ S! m% C# [SummaryFrequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB | +0.02, -0.25 | Very good | Noise level, dB (A) | -92.0 | Very good | Dynamic range, dB (A) | 92.0 | Very good | THD, % | 0.0016 | Excellent | THD + Noise, dB (A) | -85.4 | Good | IMD + Noise, % | 0.0074 | Excellent | Stereo crosstalk, dB | -89.1 | Excellent | IMD at 10 kHz, % | 0.0075 | Excellent | General performance |
' K9 u/ M( _3 m" D- ? | Excellent | IMD的差距足以致命5 i* o9 A( D& u$ p# G0 f
! d- W3 Y2 e2 n& k% r
那么,16/48如何呢?se200的16/48和16/44差不多的
$ X; q0 H* C4 G4 R不过hdaudio么:2 b$ E# z, Q1 U2 Q( J4 I+ N1 @
SummaryFrequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB | +0.04, -0.21 | Very good | Noise level, dB (A) | -91.8 | Very good | Dynamic range, dB (A) | 91.7 | Very good | THD, % | 0.0012 | Excellent | THD + Noise, dB (A) | -84.1 | Good | IMD + Noise, % | 0.0080 | Excellent | Stereo crosstalk, dB | -90.1 | Excellent | IMD at 10 kHz, % | 0.0075 | Excellent | General performance |
' p! a4 h6 }' R' ?' b | Excellent | * \( k3 r2 t, ]: \; _
注意IMD,已经达到se200 7.1的水平了!, v$ m8 k5 l3 V6 ~# g
其他数据也不弱!& P- P1 `- K/ \! \/ o% r/ X: p7 B
4 d4 Z( l& @9 K7 L4 o& G: ~+ u不过么,16bit下的测试向来被我无视的:shifty: |
|