|
|
被你引来引去的文章，看人家的结论：
: `" _3 q& M5 L; d, K+ N5 ?" pObviously, the cable is just a pair of wires below the transition frequency, and your speaker cables (regardless of claims or cost) are exactly the same. In case you may want to simulate this effect yourself, I used DCR=1Ω, L=200nH and C=100pF per metre, and used a 100 metre line. A shorter line does exactly the same thing, but the frequency where it becomes a transmission line (rather than a couple of wires) increases as the line length is reduced. For a 10 metre cable, the frequency is 1Mhz, and for 3 metres this increases further to 3.3MHz. These effects were present in all the previous simulations, but were masked by the amplifier's rolloff.
! r9 V! |; }5 z3 [ w/ S& t' @* E" |7 j3 _( l8 z+ t
不管是同轴电缆还是你的音箱线，即便是以他用来计算的放得很大的模拟参数DCR=1Ω, L=200nH and C=100pF per metre，10米的线在1Mhz的频率以下都可以认为是理想传输线，3米的极限是3.3Mhz。
3 ]! q6 s o8 C1 {4 [0 t/ C. y5 x
3 y: _; t- [" ?9 F' H4 JIt is worth noting that none of these cables is 1dB down on midband level at any frequency up to 20kHz, and even the Figure-8 lead is only 1dB down at 50kHz - it is a rare tweeter indeed that will be anywhere near as good, regardless of price
! a/ O: V; U& [" W7 {6 e( ~. J
! o1 q$ A# Q2 }# z$ ]/ [1 k即便是五金店卖的8号线，在50khz也不过是1db的衰减。* V( K3 ?' Y& X+ W! C; K
注意了，人家比的是图21里红绿线的差值。
5 `" v% Q1 e% F/ ^6 Z
, L! z; q& \8 S% E, and the Goertz cable will set you back about US$200 a pair for 4 metre lengths (and maybe make your amplifier oscillate). Naturally, you can spend a great deal more (and still make the amp oscillate), but I don't see much point.- W. I3 H8 {" V# A% a M" {) ?
$ @. ]8 w9 |. F4 X8 b# `8 D
由于它过大的电容，200美刀一对的好线可能会引起放大器反馈振荡（应该是这意思吧），尽管它在超出20k以上的频段取得了很好的频响拟合，但作者还是看不出它可取之处。 |
|
IP卡
狗仔卡
发表于 2010-1-15 14:28
显身卡
