POPPUR爱换

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

手机号码,快捷登录

搜索
查看: 17955|回复: 193
打印 上一主题 下一主题

AMD:性能渣也要盈利……

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2008-5-10 15:21 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
AMD: Financial Performance Should Not Depend on Products Performance.
AMD Is Re-Architecting the Company, but Remains Mum on Details

Category: Other
by Anton Shilov

[ 05/08/2008 | 11:33 PM ]

Despite of expectations, Advanced Micro Devices did not unveil any details regarding its “asset-smart” strategy or any concrete decisions that influence the future of the company at its annual meeting with shareholders. What the company indicated was that it wants to be profitable with current revenue level and that it plans to focus strictly on core businesses.
The year 2007 was difficult transition year for AMD. I could not be more disappointed with our financial results. […]We will return to profitability. We are committed for sustainable profitability,” said Hector Ruiz, chairman of the board and chief executive officer at AMD.

Mr. Ruiz stressed that the management is currently re-organizing the company “so that to be profitable at our current revenue stream”. The issue that AMD ran into in the last two years was that its microprocessors and graphics processors cannot demonstrate performance as high as that of competing solutions, which eroded the company’s profit margins and forced to focus on lowering prices. But even with inexpensive products the company should be profitable, said the chief executive.

“While the short-term goal is to achieve operational profitability in the second half of this year, our long-term goal is to achieve consistent profitability in good times and bad times. We are re-architecting the business so that our financial success is not invariably dependent on continuous component performance leadership over our rich and dominant competitor,” said the head of AMD.

Unfortunately, nothing new was said about AMD’s “asset smart” strategy.

“We are progressing with our ‘asset-smart’ strategy [under which] we will deploy our manufacturing assets [in the most] cost-effective [way], but stay on the leading edge and deliver customer value,” said Mr. Ruiz and promised to reveal more details regarding “asset smart” in future.

According to CEO of AMD, the company plans to get rid of certain non-core businesses in case they do not bring profits. Regrettably, no businesses were named.
“We plan to make fewer things better. We are constantly scrutinizing our non-core businesses and revisiting their strategic fit in the company,” said Mr. Ruiz, adding that the company would exit businesses that do not bring profits to AMD, but stressed that central processing units and graphics processing units are the businesses that are the most important for the company.

Right after AMD acquired ATI Technologies, market share of the latter began to shrink and achieved its lowest point in many years – 18.3% – in Q4 2007. But Mr. Ruiz said that the future looks bright for next-generation ATI Radeon graphics chips and ATI will regain its positions on the market.

“The next-generation ATI Radeon graphics looks impressive. We believe in our potential for market share gain this quarter and beyond,” promised the chief executive of AMD.
2#
发表于 2008-5-10 15:44 | 只看该作者
SF 请翻译
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

3#
发表于 2008-5-10 16:57 | 只看该作者
话说当年INTEL的P4    性能渣的像狗屎一样

不是照样大把大把的赚钞票??

性能渣就不该赚钱?

那当年给INTEL送钱的是哪些S B?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

dsqin 该用户已被删除
4#
发表于 2008-5-10 17:11 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

5#
发表于 2008-5-10 17:16 | 只看该作者
原帖由 scowl 于 2008-5-10 16:57 发表
话说当年INTEL的P4    性能渣的像狗屎一样

不是照样大把大把的赚钞票??

性能渣就不该赚钱?

那当年给INTEL送钱的是哪些S B?

K7性能连屎都不如
K8性能跟屎半斤八两
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

6#
发表于 2008-5-10 17:20 | 只看该作者
原帖由 elisha 于 2008-5-10 17:16 发表

K7性能连屎都不如
K8性能跟屎半斤八两


纯引个 :loveliness:
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

7#
发表于 2008-5-10 17:28 | 只看该作者
原帖由 elisha 于 2008-5-10 17:16 发表

K7性能连屎都不如
K8性能跟屎半斤八两


+1 :loveliness:
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

8#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-10 17:31 | 只看该作者
原帖由 elisha 于 2008-5-10 17:16 发表

K7性能连屎都不如
K8性能跟屎半斤八两


再+1 ……
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

9#
发表于 2008-5-10 18:16 | 只看该作者
原帖由 elisha 于 2008-5-10 17:16 发表

K7性能连屎都不如


比北木头

K8性能跟屎半斤八两


比各种肉
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

10#
发表于 2008-5-10 19:13 | 只看该作者
早就发过了,哈哈
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

11#
发表于 2008-5-10 19:46 | 只看该作者
股东大会就这么向股东交代啊[w00t>
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

12#
发表于 2008-5-10 19:52 | 只看该作者
性能不行只能搞错位竞争,就是所谓的田忌赛马,然后拉低价格

服务器和工作站市场的利润更高,看AMD能卖出多少了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

13#
发表于 2008-5-10 19:58 | 只看该作者
k8出来的时候肉在哪里啊~~
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

14#
发表于 2008-5-10 20:00 | 只看该作者
原帖由 gaot 于 2008-5-10 19:58 发表
k8出来的时候肉在哪里啊~~

这是开2008年股东大会,不是开2005年的
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

15#
发表于 2008-5-10 20:09 | 只看该作者
原帖由 scowl 于 2008-5-10 16:57 发表
话说当年INTEL的P4    性能渣的像狗屎一样

不是照样大把大把的赚钞票??

性能渣就不该赚钱?

那当年给INTEL送钱的是哪些S B?

如果05年AMD能把X2(任意一种,阉货也行)卖到5XX还不缺货——就像intel现在做的那样——保证intel把P4赚的都吐出来。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

16#
发表于 2008-5-10 20:11 | 只看该作者
原帖由 permediaX 于 2008-5-10 19:52 发表
性能不行只能搞错位竞争,就是所谓的田忌赛马,然后拉低价格

服务器和工作站市场的利润更高,看AMD能卖出多少了

想玩田忌赛马好歹有个成本优势,没有的话只是赔本赚吆喝罢了。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

17#
发表于 2008-5-10 20:22 | 只看该作者
ACQ同学看到这种贴很兴奋,哈哈,恭喜。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

18#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-10 20:47 | 只看该作者
原帖由 permediaX 于 2008-5-10 19:52 发表
性能不行只能搞错位竞争,就是所谓的田忌赛马,然后拉低价格

服务器和工作站市场的利润更高,看AMD能卖出多少了


连Cray和Sun都倒戈了,A社的高端只怕是比桌面溃败的还彻底
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

19#
发表于 2008-5-10 21:02 | 只看该作者
原帖由 awoo 于 2008-5-10 20:22 发表
ACQ同学看到这种贴很兴奋,哈哈,恭喜。

跟屁虫同学果然跟着来了。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

20#
发表于 2008-5-10 21:05 | 只看该作者
原帖由 acqwer 于 2008-5-10 21:02 发表

跟屁虫同学果然跟着来了。


跟屁虫这个涵义不对啊,一般是指观点相同的,我们俩是相左的。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

广告投放或合作|网站地图|处罚通告|

GMT+8, 2025-8-15 16:06

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 POPPUR.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表