|
原帖由 Leading 于 2008-6-17 21:11 发表 + [: _0 H/ @6 C' x, h
! P- q* Q7 y) A# e5 K+ Z% N
" \" y5 `, `; U7 L0 _好你要回应" G. j) W+ O6 W
----------------------------------------------------9 X7 {, f% b$ L! b% L$ P
; }2 Y; g) O. ^# c X. |" m8 I为了方便先翻译成中文:"Few day ago"是正确的,你的根据Google搜索结果认为这种用法是语法上有错的观点只能说明你普普通通的英语水平和缺乏搜索技巧。: w" q' a0 x: e1 Z, A, K9 |( \) f* F1 Q5 V; Z! k! O
一个说话者或者作者为了更精确地表达意思可以忽略语法原则在过去时后面使用现在时。2 g" z8 d6 I2 W e/ |
----------------------------------------------------
8 j0 e/ x0 L9 b9 T- i% ^; _. }7 ~0 r" B" A; O$ w9 e. I* y* d2 S( K$ x: a& a5 V
你既然能这样说,那我也可以说:你这些论调完全没有支撑点,用英文来回复别人的发言只能显示你理屈词穷。
5 ^; [9 K4 M3 T+ z4 _! ~; }& |6 f2 V& }- n
好了75楼,现在轮到你举例,要“美国英国澳大利亚”的“书面材料”并且是从Google上找来的哦,最好有个图文解说什么的,显示显示你的搜索技巧。 - Y- M- b6 ^$ u
# {- M4 H: p5 v) D
"Few day ago" is right,your opinion that this usage is syntactically wrong only due to the result of Google only illustrates your mediocre English level and poor searching technique, : L; C q ]4 Z: v$ H, Z/ _/ o
A speaker or writer can ignore the proximity rule and use a present tense after a past or a past after a present in order to be more precise。- z" A. K" V8 L
He told me he is a good tennis-player (he still is)
3 b1 N; `+ n( v+ m0 g+ eOur teacher said that the Earth is round5 m/ C: a2 Z5 D# `$ ]
4 ~% J/ o' r/ ~
你仅仅因为Google的结果而认为这个用法在语法上是错误的只能说明……+ B, Z( g$ m3 f5 d* p K
一个演讲者或者作者为了更加准确地表达可以忽略就近原则而在过去时后使用现在时或者在现在时后使用过去时
1 q! H0 U/ ~, I, o1 n1 IHe told me he is a good tennis-player (he still is); i" J2 p2 y! J6 c
Our teacher said that the Earth is round
}) |- k& `' b V------------% I& s1 ~% k( f( D7 }" K% ^
The word "speaker" here means :someone who makes a formal speech to a group of people# p$ k: @& R, K; {+ \2 m
"due to" means "because of".Just slightly formal.4 g& o8 d. Y4 s1 Q- O" o
i/ T3 n/ p7 X, W5 N" \
' }9 M' H! ^9 U! q0 v: h# R
"Longman English Grammar" ,by L.G.Alexander,page 161-162, Chapter 9.5,"The sequence of tenses", 9.5.2:" The proximity rule",English version.+ L4 V6 ]8 D* J+ c3 _' I7 k/ x
& M) n* e5 Y( q, o[ 本帖最后由 海森堡的狗 于 2008-6-18 11:22 编辑 ] |
|