|
|
被你引来引去的文章，看人家的结论：/ X0 Z3 S9 L4 I, ^) Z! s/ p3 J
Obviously, the cable is just a pair of wires below the transition frequency, and your speaker cables (regardless of claims or cost) are exactly the same. In case you may want to simulate this effect yourself, I used DCR=1Ω, L=200nH and C=100pF per metre, and used a 100 metre line. A shorter line does exactly the same thing, but the frequency where it becomes a transmission line (rather than a couple of wires) increases as the line length is reduced. For a 10 metre cable, the frequency is 1Mhz, and for 3 metres this increases further to 3.3MHz. These effects were present in all the previous simulations, but were masked by the amplifier's rolloff. V/ l- J* ]# n& \& H/ P
T2 K% z m9 H3 @& W4 Y/ M
不管是同轴电缆还是你的音箱线，即便是以他用来计算的放得很大的模拟参数DCR=1Ω, L=200nH and C=100pF per metre，10米的线在1Mhz的频率以下都可以认为是理想传输线，3米的极限是3.3Mhz。/ K2 T4 z0 P5 }
8 F0 a+ p- E4 a- \& a0 n9 r$ S n, g# O9 O
It is worth noting that none of these cables is 1dB down on midband level at any frequency up to 20kHz, and even the Figure-8 lead is only 1dB down at 50kHz - it is a rare tweeter indeed that will be anywhere near as good, regardless of price, s$ H" k- e, J2 ?4 n) S
$ Y6 g. [; V3 \
即便是五金店卖的8号线，在50khz也不过是1db的衰减。
* j; W, {) }2 B( D注意了，人家比的是图21里红绿线的差值。
# ]! v! w- a. \: g# U$ i3 l: V* |$ p8 Q/ D
, and the Goertz cable will set you back about US$200 a pair for 4 metre lengths (and maybe make your amplifier oscillate). Naturally, you can spend a great deal more (and still make the amp oscillate), but I don't see much point.
' ^" A Q s0 D7 r* H7 o' c$ t% j( K0 a. ]: \% s6 S, ^! Q
由于它过大的电容，200美刀一对的好线可能会引起放大器反馈振荡（应该是这意思吧），尽管它在超出20k以上的频段取得了很好的频响拟合，但作者还是看不出它可取之处。 |
|
IP卡
狗仔卡
发表于 2010-1-15 14:26
显身卡
