|
|
被你引来引去的文章，看人家的结论：. e% l$ c5 l" I
Obviously, the cable is just a pair of wires below the transition frequency, and your speaker cables (regardless of claims or cost) are exactly the same. In case you may want to simulate this effect yourself, I used DCR=1Ω, L=200nH and C=100pF per metre, and used a 100 metre line. A shorter line does exactly the same thing, but the frequency where it becomes a transmission line (rather than a couple of wires) increases as the line length is reduced. For a 10 metre cable, the frequency is 1Mhz, and for 3 metres this increases further to 3.3MHz. These effects were present in all the previous simulations, but were masked by the amplifier's rolloff.
% ]0 m+ ^$ O0 y( S9 J- V7 I" s3 T
1 }+ Q" }* B5 N3 y8 H不管是同轴电缆还是你的音箱线，即便是以他用来计算的放得很大的模拟参数DCR=1Ω, L=200nH and C=100pF per metre，10米的线在1Mhz的频率以下都可以认为是理想传输线，3米的极限是3.3Mhz。8 z8 y% |! K- \) B6 `* H6 K; }9 c/ I
" _2 o( U$ K* ?# v# [# {# S% n: M8 a* T* l- u
It is worth noting that none of these cables is 1dB down on midband level at any frequency up to 20kHz, and even the Figure-8 lead is only 1dB down at 50kHz - it is a rare tweeter indeed that will be anywhere near as good, regardless of price
k" d# W' O' C: x' H' x5 R. n7 @) |" A0 j! W$ }- F6 \
即便是五金店卖的8号线，在50khz也不过是1db的衰减。
: T* @) s8 ]; i7 y3 k% W6 C5 @9 y4 @注意了，人家比的是图21里红绿线的差值。
0 A% ^) ]3 G' L: ~
5 \1 Q/ E# `/ P) B! b/ i/ x, and the Goertz cable will set you back about US$200 a pair for 4 metre lengths (and maybe make your amplifier oscillate). Naturally, you can spend a great deal more (and still make the amp oscillate), but I don't see much point.
- W' }* C7 T0 z8 k8 y8 ?* p3 ]# ?" V/ q0 f
由于它过大的电容，200美刀一对的好线可能会引起放大器反馈振荡（应该是这意思吧），尽管它在超出20k以上的频段取得了很好的频响拟合，但作者还是看不出它可取之处。 |
|
IP卡
狗仔卡
发表于 2010-1-15 14:28
显身卡
