|
|
被你引来引去的文章，看人家的结论：8 Q4 l3 i% ~2 J& U1 `
Obviously, the cable is just a pair of wires below the transition frequency, and your speaker cables (regardless of claims or cost) are exactly the same. In case you may want to simulate this effect yourself, I used DCR=1Ω, L=200nH and C=100pF per metre, and used a 100 metre line. A shorter line does exactly the same thing, but the frequency where it becomes a transmission line (rather than a couple of wires) increases as the line length is reduced. For a 10 metre cable, the frequency is 1Mhz, and for 3 metres this increases further to 3.3MHz. These effects were present in all the previous simulations, but were masked by the amplifier's rolloff.- K' E0 H8 q& i+ u6 \/ O/ v1 T
; R$ d- ^! J! |: y1 T不管是同轴电缆还是你的音箱线，即便是以他用来计算的放得很大的模拟参数DCR=1Ω, L=200nH and C=100pF per metre，10米的线在1Mhz的频率以下都可以认为是理想传输线，3米的极限是3.3Mhz。
- W. j0 V. I6 f" d. y0 i' q1 h0 k
! ?* ^+ F; j( i' o/ Y c; e! z8 S7 V& p5 P% \+ h8 U
It is worth noting that none of these cables is 1dB down on midband level at any frequency up to 20kHz, and even the Figure-8 lead is only 1dB down at 50kHz - it is a rare tweeter indeed that will be anywhere near as good, regardless of price
9 v8 q3 v# }/ K0 S1 [$ T
' M0 O; n* e2 D: e5 K6 n- `即便是五金店卖的8号线，在50khz也不过是1db的衰减。
6 ^# D5 l$ y% l' E9 X& \" N注意了，人家比的是图21里红绿线的差值。, U8 q, h1 S- b; F0 p$ i
) N& d- k" \! s, d% F. p# ~
, and the Goertz cable will set you back about US$200 a pair for 4 metre lengths (and maybe make your amplifier oscillate). Naturally, you can spend a great deal more (and still make the amp oscillate), but I don't see much point.
0 C, M0 f. C3 y9 l
; t6 b3 |1 b4 E6 ~( h) O由于它过大的电容，200美刀一对的好线可能会引起放大器反馈振荡（应该是这意思吧），尽管它在超出20k以上的频段取得了很好的频响拟合，但作者还是看不出它可取之处。 |
|
IP卡
狗仔卡
发表于 2010-1-15 14:26
显身卡
