|
|
被你引来引去的文章，看人家的结论：
$ C! c8 _& R/ v' o& uObviously, the cable is just a pair of wires below the transition frequency, and your speaker cables (regardless of claims or cost) are exactly the same. In case you may want to simulate this effect yourself, I used DCR=1Ω, L=200nH and C=100pF per metre, and used a 100 metre line. A shorter line does exactly the same thing, but the frequency where it becomes a transmission line (rather than a couple of wires) increases as the line length is reduced. For a 10 metre cable, the frequency is 1Mhz, and for 3 metres this increases further to 3.3MHz. These effects were present in all the previous simulations, but were masked by the amplifier's rolloff.
$ M/ W1 f" Q1 ^3 F) `) H+ U3 E9 B7 J, x. Y' K
不管是同轴电缆还是你的音箱线，即便是以他用来计算的放得很大的模拟参数DCR=1Ω, L=200nH and C=100pF per metre，10米的线在1Mhz的频率以下都可以认为是理想传输线，3米的极限是3.3Mhz。. p3 y6 d. B+ F+ D$ Y J0 p
9 @& i5 v3 M* E! x v
! x4 H$ ^* S+ z" ~7 h* O2 c# b$ p \% QIt is worth noting that none of these cables is 1dB down on midband level at any frequency up to 20kHz, and even the Figure-8 lead is only 1dB down at 50kHz - it is a rare tweeter indeed that will be anywhere near as good, regardless of price
0 d% \1 k: ~1 Y4 n: @% W/ O0 n# v9 F7 ?0 q; ^: l v
即便是五金店卖的8号线，在50khz也不过是1db的衰减。# W: z# b. i6 l! o g: I( D
注意了，人家比的是图21里红绿线的差值。
3 y" w7 q* E! H9 i- G; `) B0 r0 K- u) ?
8 {$ C* q7 \/ O/ J- s% H, and the Goertz cable will set you back about US$200 a pair for 4 metre lengths (and maybe make your amplifier oscillate). Naturally, you can spend a great deal more (and still make the amp oscillate), but I don't see much point. _6 d$ O& S4 |5 k" P
! v) p) \2 p8 u& I4 d6 }由于它过大的电容，200美刀一对的好线可能会引起放大器反馈振荡（应该是这意思吧），尽管它在超出20k以上的频段取得了很好的频响拟合，但作者还是看不出它可取之处。 |
|
IP卡
狗仔卡
发表于 2010-1-15 14:28
显身卡
