|
|
被你引来引去的文章，看人家的结论：
4 I* b) K5 ~7 L9 N" O4 R0 ?2 HObviously, the cable is just a pair of wires below the transition frequency, and your speaker cables (regardless of claims or cost) are exactly the same. In case you may want to simulate this effect yourself, I used DCR=1Ω, L=200nH and C=100pF per metre, and used a 100 metre line. A shorter line does exactly the same thing, but the frequency where it becomes a transmission line (rather than a couple of wires) increases as the line length is reduced. For a 10 metre cable, the frequency is 1Mhz, and for 3 metres this increases further to 3.3MHz. These effects were present in all the previous simulations, but were masked by the amplifier's rolloff.
) A0 Q+ \6 D* W! M ~3 E+ ~$ G0 H7 @) W
不管是同轴电缆还是你的音箱线，即便是以他用来计算的放得很大的模拟参数DCR=1Ω, L=200nH and C=100pF per metre，10米的线在1Mhz的频率以下都可以认为是理想传输线，3米的极限是3.3Mhz。
6 S5 Y' y; ]8 `& E g7 g* L& h! P
$ u9 V' \0 L7 X
1 X& ]1 M0 Q1 J4 m! @; j7 \& ^It is worth noting that none of these cables is 1dB down on midband level at any frequency up to 20kHz, and even the Figure-8 lead is only 1dB down at 50kHz - it is a rare tweeter indeed that will be anywhere near as good, regardless of price
# h+ g2 |/ @2 {5 {. k3 b1 [% [/ L, o! y( d ^( v
即便是五金店卖的8号线，在50khz也不过是1db的衰减。
* j& L$ A& ]2 y注意了，人家比的是图21里红绿线的差值。
) s9 s C+ M9 s7 s0 Z8 h# N$ ~: C
' @ M; F5 v5 ?, and the Goertz cable will set you back about US$200 a pair for 4 metre lengths (and maybe make your amplifier oscillate). Naturally, you can spend a great deal more (and still make the amp oscillate), but I don't see much point.
2 l. o) U" h5 c/ ~; R
; b* x( ~+ |) N6 ?由于它过大的电容，200美刀一对的好线可能会引起放大器反馈振荡（应该是这意思吧），尽管它在超出20k以上的频段取得了很好的频响拟合，但作者还是看不出它可取之处。 |
|
IP卡
狗仔卡
发表于 2010-1-15 14:28
显身卡
